MARTEC II Maritime Technologies II Projektbeispiele

Transkript

1 MARTEC II Maritime Technologies II Projektbeispiele Dr. Ralf Fiedler Wien,

2 Partnersuche 1. Eigene Kontakte in Partnerländern 2. Internetrecherche 3. MARTEC Kontaktpersonen 4. MARTEC Brokerage Event 5. Profile auf der MARTEC-Internetseite einstellen

3 Profile auf der MARTEC-Internetseite einstellen

4 Profile auf der MARTEC-Internetseite einstellen

5 Projektbeispiel Projekt Titel Priorität ULTRALIGHT MATERIALS FOR ICE BREAKING CARGOVESSELS (ULIVES) Schiffbau / Binnenschifffahrt Inhalt Leichtbaukonzepte für Schiffsaufbauten Dauer 36 Monate ( ) Partner LAFFC. FhG Helsinki SMK Lätzsch Koordinator Uni Typ KMU F F KMU KMU Land FI DE FI DE DE Kosten 1,1 Mio. Förderung 0,8 Mio.

6 Projektbeispiel Projekt Titel Robots in Tanks (ROT) Priorität Inhalt Schiffbau Roboterkonzept für Inspektionen und Reinigung von Tanks (u.a. Ballastwassertanks) Dauer 24 Monate ( ) Partner Meyer Werft DFKI DNV (Koordinator) Typ GU F GU Land DE DE NO Kosten 1 Mio. Förderung 0,7 Mio.

7 Projektbeispiel Projekt Titel High Sensitive Deep Sea Methane Monitoring (HISEM) Priorität Inhalt Offshore Technologie Entwicklung und Test eines hochempfindlichen Methansensors Dauer 36 Monate ( ) Partner IFM-Geomar Contros Wintershall (Koordinator) Typ F KMU GU Land DE DE NL Kosten 0,44 Mio. Förderung 0,33 Mio.

8 Förderschwerpunkte in MARTEC Aufrufen No Priority Area MARTEC CALLS TOTAL 1 Shipbuilding-new ship types, structures, ship design Shipbuilding - production process and technology Maritime equipment and services Ship and port operation services Inland water and intermodal transport 0 6 Offshore industry/ offshore technology Offshore structures for renewable energy Polar technology 0 9 Fishing / aquaculture Total

9 MARTEC Pilot Call Questionnaire How did you experience the application procedure? (simple, understandable, complicated) Was there enough information available? (MARTEC webpage, National funding agency, contact person) Was the evaluation process clear to you? It became clear after sometime. How do you assess the time needed for the application procedure? Could be quicker!

10 2009 Call Questionnaire Application procedure How did you experience the application procedure? (simple, understandable, complicated) HISEM (DE) - the application process was understandable PREFUL (DE) - simple IMPACT (SE) - understandable

11 2009 Call Questionnaire Application procedure Was there enough information available? (MARTEC webpage, National funding agency, contact person) HISEM (DE) PREFUL (DE) IMPACT (SE) - webpage and MARTEC national contact partner provided useful information and support - webpage okay, the interdependence of national application after MARTEC application was not so clear - nat. funding agency, MARTEC contact person

12 2009 Call Questionnaire Application procedure Evaluation of your proposal Was the evaluation process clear to you? HISEM (DE) - the evaluation process and evaluation criteria were clear and reasonable PREFUL (DE) - it was clear from the materials describing evaluation one could download from MARTEC website IMPACT (SE) - yes

13 2009 Call Questionnaire Application procedure Time schedule How do you assess the time needed for the application procedure? HISEM (DE) - the time needed for application and the evaluation process was appropriate PREFUL (DE) - the application procedure seems to have a reasonable time frame, also the evaluation process is done within acceptable time IMPACT (SE) - OK

14 2009 Call Questionnaire Application procedure Time schedule What do you think of the time needed for the decision on funding? HISEM (DE) final decision arrived after the planned starting date IMPACT (SE) OK, but different time schedules and evaluation schemes for different countries makes it complicated.

15 2009 Call Questionnaire Partner search How did you find your partner of your MARTEC project? (existing network, MARTEC website, somewhere else) PREFUL (DE) IMPACT (SE) - we found each other due to a previous common proposal - existing network

16 Projektrahmen Koordinator: Partner: möglichst ein Industriepartner 2 10 (Forscher, Hersteller, Anwender) Kostenrahmen: abhängig von nationalen Mitteln Förderung: durchschnittlich 1 Mio. pro Projekt Möglichst je ein Industrieunternehmen je Partnerland!