Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Transkript

1 Universität Hohenheim (00) Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 709 Stuttgart Frau Sabrina Maute Assistentin des Studiendekans Prof. Dr. Alfonso Sousa-Poza Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Sousa-Poza, Sie erhalten hier die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation zur Veranstaltung Consumption & Savings Fragebogen Typ en-lect: Der zuerst angegebene Globalindikator setzt sich aus folgenden Skalen des Fragebogens zusammen: - Lecturer's characteristics Als nächstes werden die einzelnen Mittelwerte der oben genannten Skalen aufgeführt. Im zweiten Teil des Auswertungsberichts werden die Mittelwerte aller einzelnen Fragen aufgelistet. Dann sehen Sie große Histogramme zu den Skalafragen. Die großen Histogramme enthalten im Vergleich mit der Detailauswertung abgesehen von der Größe keine wesentlichen Unterschiede. Als nächstes finden Sie in dem Auswertungsbericht eine Profillinie. Die Profillinie zeichnet eine gestrichelte Linie der Mittelwerte zu den Skalafragen. Die Präsentationsvorlage dient der Besprechung der Ergebnisse mit den Studierenden. Als letztes werden die Antworten auf offene Fragen aufgelistet. Sie werden als Bildausschnitte nach Fragen sortiert. Bei Rückfragen steht Ihnen die Arbeitsstelle für Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation zur Verfügung EvaSys Auswertung Seite

2 Prof. Dr.Alfonso Sousa-Poza Consumption & Savings (8W) Erfasste Frageböge Globalwerte mw=.68 Globalindikator s=0.6 mw=.68 Lecturer's characteristics (Alpha = 0.99) - + s=0.6 Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Fragetext Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Linker Pol Skala Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Median Quantil Rechter Pol Histogramm n=anzahl mw=mittelwert md=median s=standardabweichung E.=Enthaltung Lecturer's characteristics.).).).).).6).7) The topics were explained sufficiently and further information was given. The examples used contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents. 6% The lecturer referred to other fields. The lecturer illustrated the interrelation between the different topics. The lecturer's presentation was structured well. The media used (e.g. PowerPoint, blackboard, overhead projector) contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents. The lecturer motivated me to prepare and review this course. 6% mw=.7 md= s=0.6 mw=. md= s=0.76 mw=.6 md= s=0.7 mw=. md= s=0.76 mw=.7 md= s=0.7 mw=.6 md= s=0.7 mw=.88 md= s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 .8).9).0).).).).).).6).7) I was encouraged to think about the topics discussed in this course. I was encouraged to participate actively in this course. I felt free to ask questions and make comments. 6% The lecturer conveyed enthusiasm. The study and working atmosphere in this course was pleasant. This course prepared me for exams or other course assesments. The lecturer clearly communicated the learning objectives of this course. 7% 8% In this course I have learned plenty. Attending this course was worth it. How would you grade this course? ( = worst; = best) mw=.6 md= s=0.7 mw=. md= s=0.9 mw=. md= s=0.76 mw=.7 md= s=0.7 mw=.6 md= s=0.7 n=6 mw=.67 md= s=0.8 E.= mw=.6 md= s=0.7 mw=.88 md= s=0. mw=.88 md= s=0. mw=.88 md= s=0. Complexity.).) The pace of this course was... too low very high The level of difficulty was... too low very high 6% 8% mw=. md= s=0.6 mw=.8 md= s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 .).).) The effort necessary to prepare and review this course was... too low very high The amount of content taught was... too low very high The prerequisites for this course were... too low very high mw=. md= s=0.6 mw=. md= s=0. mw=. md= s=0. Surrounding Conditions.).).).).6).7).8).9) Tidiness of room 6 8% 6 Ventilation 6 6 Number of seats 6 6% 6 Noise 6 8% 6 Acoustics 6 8% 8% 6 Disturbance by fellow students 6 8% 6 Lighting 6 8% 6 Quality of seats 6 % 9% 9% 6 mw=. md= s=.9 mw=.7 md=. s=.9 mw=.6 md= s=0.9 mw=.7 md= s=0.7 mw=.88 md= s=0.8 mw=. md= s=. mw=.88 md=. s=0.99 n=7 mw=.86 md= s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 Concluding Assessment.) I would approve funding this course by tuition fees in order to improve the conditions of teaching. % 86% n=7 mw=.7 md= s=0.76 E.= Basic Personal Data.) How many sessions of this course did you NOT attend? % n=6 mw=. s=0..%.) Please select the number of semesters you have been enrolled for your programme. n=6 mw=.67 s=0.8.% 6.7%.) Please select the programme you are enrolled for. n=7 MSc Management - Interorganisational.% MSc Economics 8.7% EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 Histogramme zu den Skalafragen.).).) mw =.7 mw =. mw =.6 s = 0.6 6% s = 0.76 s = 0.7 The topics were explained sufficiently and further information was given. The examples used contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents. The lecturer referred to other fields..).).6) mw =. mw =.7 mw =.6 6% s = 0.76 s = 0.7 s = 0.7 The lecturer illustrated the interrelation between the different topics. The lecturer's presentation was structured well. The media used (e.g. PowerPoint, blackboard, overhead projector) contributed to the.7).8).9) mw =.88 mw =.6 mw =. s = 0. s = 0.7 s = 0.9 The lecturer motivated me to prepare and review this course. I was encouraged to think about the topics discussed in this course. I was encouraged to participate actively in this course..0).).) mw =. mw =.7 mw =.6 6% s = 0.76 s = 0.7 s = 0.7 I felt free to ask questions and make comments. The lecturer conveyed enthusiasm. The study and working atmosphere in this course was pleasant EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

7 .).).) % mw =.67 mw =.6 mw =.88 s = 0.8 s = 0.7 s = 0. 7% n = 6 This course prepared me for exams or other course assesments. The lecturer clearly communicated the learning objectives of this course. In this course I have learned plenty..6).7).) too low very high mw =.88 mw =.88 mw =. s = 0. s = 0. s = 0.6 Attending this course was worth it. How would you grade this course?( = worst; = best) The pace of this course was....).).) too low very high too low very high too low very high mw =.8 mw =. mw =. 6% s = 0. s = 0.6 s = 0. 8% The level of difficulty was... The effort necessary to prepare and review this course was... The amount of content taught was....).).) too low very high mw =. mw =. mw =.7 s = 0. s =.9 s =.9 8% The prerequisites for this course were... Tidiness of room Ventilation.).).6) mw =.6 mw =.7 mw =.88 6% s = 0.9 s = 0.7 s = 0.8 8% 8% 8% Number of seats Noise Acoustics EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

8 .7).8).9) mw =. mw =.88 mw =.86 8% s =. 8% s = 0.99 % 9% 9% s = 0.9 n = 7 Disturbance by fellow students Lighting Quality of seats.) 0 86% mw =.7 s = 0.76 % n = 7 I would approve funding this course by tuition fees in order to improve the conditions of EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

9 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Fakultät WISO Prof. Dr. Alfonso Sousa-Poza Consumption & Savings.) The topics were explained sufficiently and further information was given..) The examples used contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents. mw=.7 mw=..) The lecturer referred to other fields. mw=.6.) The lecturer illustrated the interrelation between the different topics. mw=..) The lecturer's presentation was structured well. mw=.7.6) The media used (e.g. PowerPoint, blackboard, overhead projector) contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents. mw=.6.7) The lecturer motivated me to prepare and review this course. mw=.88.8) I was encouraged to think about the topics discussed in this course. mw=.6.9) I was encouraged to participate actively in this course. mw=..0) I felt free to ask questions and make comments. mw=..) The lecturer conveyed enthusiasm. mw=.7.) The study and working atmosphere in this course was pleasant. mw=.6.) This course prepared me for exams or other course assesments. mw=.67.) The lecturer clearly communicated the learning objectives of this course. mw=.6.) In this course I have learned plenty. mw=.88.6) Attending this course was worth it. mw=.88.7) How would you grade this course? ( = worst; = best) mw=.88.) The pace of this course was... too low very high mw=..) The level of difficulty was... too low very high mw=.8.) The effort necessary to prepare and review this course was... too low very high mw=..) The amount of content taught was... too low very high mw=..) The prerequisites for this course were... too low very high mw=..) Tidiness of room 6 mw=..) Ventilation 6 mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9

10 .) Number of seats 6 mw=.6.) Noise 6 mw=.7.6) Acoustics 6 mw=.88.7) Disturbance by fellow students 6 mw=..8) Lighting 6 mw=.88.9) Quality of seats 6 mw=.86.) I would approve funding this course by tuition fees in order to improve the conditions of teaching. mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 0

11 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Fakultät WISO Prof. Dr. Alfonso Sousa-Poza Consumption & Savings Lecturer's characteristics - + mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

12 Präsentationsvorlage Vorlesung Consumption & Savings Prof. Dr. Alfonso Sousa-Poza Erfasste Frageböge Lecturer's characteristics - + mw = EvaSys Auswertung Seite

13 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen.) Please name weekday/calendar date, time and room of the course you are evaluating:.) What was particularly good in this course?.) Do you have any suggestions what could be improved? Ende des Dokuments - Seite