Solar Keymark II. WP3: Solar Keymark implementation. WP3 Solar Keymark implementation technical level. technical level. 3 rd Project Meeting

Transkript

1 Solar Keymark II WP3 Solar Keymark implementation 3 rd Project Meeting Lyon, 14. & 15. February 2007, Stephan Fischer (ITW) Pfaffenwaldring 6, Stuttgart, Germany Tel: +49(0)711/ , Fax: drueck@itw.uni-stuttgart.de 1 File:..\2007\SK_WP3_M3.PPT Overall goals: 1. Further implementation of Solar Keymark certification on a common basis - definition of common procedures in case of gaps in standards - uniform quality level ---> inter-comparison tests 2. Minimise required testing effort / maximising flexibility - definition of appropriate procedures - revision of Solar Keymark scheme rules 2 1

2 WP 3 is subdivided into 3 tasks Task 1: Solar Keymark Network Task 3: Minimise testing effort by maximising flexibility 3 Task 1: Solar Keymark Network Platform for improving and maintaining the Solar Keymark certification Members: Certification bodies, test labs, inspectors, manufacturers Main tasks: - exchange of experience and procedures - definition of guidelines for improvement of guidelines and scheme rules - act as clearing body in case of conflicts 4 2

3 Ensure that tests and inspections are carried out on a uniform quality level Main tasks: - solar collector inter-comparison test - factory production inter-comparison inspection 5 Task 3: Minimise testing effort by maximising flexibility Related to factory made systems. Up to now a test of each system type is required. Develop a procedure for extrapolating performance test results for one system to systems of same type - but differing in size Main tasks: - Validate this procedure by inter-comparison test a 3 labs - Revise scheme rules including the procedure developed 6 3

4 Deliverables Reports of Solar Keymark Network meetings Validated procedure for extrapolating system test results Harmonised inspection procedures and check lists Revised Solar Keymark scheme rules Reports on WP 3 meetings 7 Milestones Task 1: Solar Keymark Network M1/1: Establish of Solar Keymark Network Date: Feb. 14, 2006 M2/1: 1st Solar Keymark Network meeting Date: June 21, 2006, Freiburg M3/1: 2nd Solar Keymark Network meeting Date: Feb. 15, 2007, Lyon M4/1: 3rd Solar Keymark Network meeting Date: combined with 4rd project meeting ( ) 8 4

5 Milestones (1/4) M1/2: Agreement on number and manufacturer/type of collectors used for intercomparison test Date: Feb 06 - One ETC-Collector from Thermomax - Two Flat-Plate Collectors from GreenOneTech 9 Milestones (2/4) Status of Collector round robin tests to be presented by Stephan Fischer (the following 6 slides are included from the presentation of Stephan Fischer) 10 5

6 Collector inter-comparison test Collectors involved: GREENoneTEC 2 pcs. FP Thermomax, 1 pcs., ETC Involved test labs: CSTB, SP, arsenal, Demokritos, INETI, ITC, ITW test of FPC: all labs (+ INTA, ISE, FSEC, CENER) test of ETC: CSTB, SP, arsenal, ITW, Demokritos (+ IZES, FSEC) Reference lab (test at beginning and optionally at the end): arsenal (GREENoneTec flat plate collector 2 m2) CSTB (Thermomax Vaccuum tube collector 2m2) Decided: - Efficiency testing only, optional: IAM, capacity - Test results will be collected and made anonymous by JEN - Costs for shipment of collectors will be paid by the lab that orders the collector for testing 11 Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT Collector inter-comparison test ETC FPC 1 FPC 2 Arsenal o X X CSTB X X -- Demokritos X -- X INETI o -- X ITC -- o -- ITW X X SP o X Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT 6

7 Collector inter-comparison test ETC FPC 1 FPC 2 FSEC o o -- INTA o ISE X IZES o CENER -- o Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT Collector inter-comparison test Decided in Lyon: FPC 1 will be send from CSTB to arsenal for final testing FPC 2 will be tested by INETI until end of March and sent to ITC afterwards, than to arsenal for final testing ETC will be tested by Demokritos in March and afterwards send to SP, further testing will be decided after that. 14 Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT 7

8 Collector inter-comparison test Please send the test results to Jan Erik Nielsen!!! 15 Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT Harmonised factory inspection report 1 st draft was compiled using the input from CERTIF, CSTB, DINCERTCO and ELOT 1 st Draft 16 Stephan Fischer SK_WP3_Lyon2.PPT 8

9 Milestones (3/4) M2/2: Agreement on number and factories (manufactures) where the factory production is carried out Date: Feb 06 --> Feb 07 Status (June 2006): So far no manufacturer offerd to have an inspection of his production line. Decided June 2006: HD will ask Thermo, GOT, Gasokol. If this leads not to a positive result, Josef Buchinger will ask Solid M3/2: Collector intercomparison tests carried out Date: September Milestones (4/4) M4/2: Intercomparison of factory production inspection finished Date: September 2007 M5/2: Final report of collector intercomparion test Date: October 2007 M6/2: Final report of factory inspection intercomparion Date: October

10 Milestones Task 3: Minimising test efforts M1/3: Agreement on number and manufacturer/type of systems used for extrapolation procedure develop. Date: Feb 06 M2/2: Draft procedure available ( ) Date: June 2007 M3/3: Systems tested Date: September 2007 M4/2: Procedure validated and incorporated in updated scheme rules (JEN) Date: October To decide: Type / Number of collectors used fo intercomp.. test Involved test labs: CSTB, SP, arsenal, Demokritos, INETI, ITC, ITW test of FPC: all labs test of ETC: CSTB, SP, arsenal, ITW Reference lab (test at beginning and optionally at the end): arsenal (GREENoneTec flat plate collector 2 m2) CSTB (Thermomax Vaccuum tube collector 2m2) Involved manufacturers: GREENoneTEC, Solahart, Thermomax Required: Two collectors of the same type Decided: - Efficiency testing only, optional: IAM, capacity - Test results will be collected and made anonymous by JEN - ITW will write down procedure for the intercomparison test and will prepare a form for reporting the test results - Costs for shipment of collectors will be paid by the lab that orders the collector for testing 20 10

11 Type / Number of systems used for development of extrapolation procedure (1/2) One thermosiphon system from Solahart Tested configurations: Config 1: 3 collector modules + 3 stores with different volume (CSTB) Config 2: 3 collector modules + 1 store (ITW) Config 3: 2 collector modules + 3 stores with different volume (INETI) Area of one collector module: approx. 2 m 2 (1.74 m 2 ) Store volumes: 150, 180 and 300 litres 21 Type / Number of systems used for development of extrapolation procedure (2/2) One forced circulation drain back system (in addition to the project tested (only) by ITW) Vsto 250 l, 2 collector modules (Ac = 4m²), immersed auxiliary heat exchanger Vsto 250 l, 2 collector modules (Ac = 4m²), internal electrical heating device Vsto 150 l, 1 collector modul (Ac = 2m²), enameled steel tank Vsto 150 l, 1 collector modul (Ac = 2m²), steanless steel tank 22 11

12 Test labs involved and status development of systems extrapolation procedure CSTB: 3 sys tests DST (Solahart system) Status: tests finished and test reports drafted INETI: 3 sys tests DST + CSTG (Solahart system) Status: One system tests completed according to CSTG All tests will be completed during the first half of 2007 ITW: 3 sys tests DST (Solahart system) Status: Two system tests completely according to DST Al tests will be completed during the first half of 2007 ITW: 4 sys tests DST (drainback system) Status: Three system tests completely according to DST Al tests will be completed during the first half of Test labs involved and status development of systems extrapolation procedure Reporting of individual activites: - CSTB - INETI - ITW (Presentation 2007\SK_WP3_HK1.PPT) 24 12

13 Next steps / activities and timing Task 1: Solar Keymark Network 2nd Solar Keymark Network meeting Date: Feb. 15, 2007, Lyon 3rd Solar Keymark Network meeting Date: combined with 4th project meeting Reporting on Solar Keymark Network meetings Date: ongoing activity 25 Next steps / activities and timing Finishing collector round robin testing Date: Summer 2007(within SK core group) Final report of collector intercomparion test Date: October 2007 Elaboration of common check lists for factory production inspection and intercomparison of factory production inspection Date: September

14 Next steps / activities and timing Task 3: Minimise testing effort by maxi. flexibility Draft procedure for extrapolation of system test results available Date: June 2007 System tests completely finished Date: September 2007 Procedure for extrapolation of system test results validated and in-co-operated in SK scheme rules Date: October End of 2007: 28 14