Formula Student Germany

Transkript

1 FSG Workshop on 8th November 2008 at BMW Schedule 07:30 08:30 60 Registration 08:30 08:45 15 Welcome 08:45 09:45 60 New Rules 10:00 11:00 60 SEF & IAD Business Plan Presentation 11:15 12:15 60 Testing and Setup New Cost Rules :15 13:30 75 Lunch 13:30 14:30 60 Highlight Speech 14:45 16:15 90 New Chassis Design Formula for Success Round Table 16:15 17:00 45 Coffee Break FSG Board meets Team Captains 17:00 18:00 60 Fuel Efficient Dynamics 18:15 18:30 15 Summary Preparation for Engineering Design One person/team only., in Studio Projekthaus in FIZ Forum in Panorama Projekthaus Speaker Highlight Speech (German) Welcome Summary Rules * SEF & IAD Testing and Setup New Chassis Design Fuel Efficient Dynamics Business Plan Presentation New Cost Rules 2009 * Formula for Success Preparation for Engineering Design * Wolfgang Mattes BMW Group Department Head Research & Development Johannes Trauth BMW Group Vice President HR Direct Munich Tim Hannig Kion Group GmbH & FSG Board / Steering Committee Dr. Ludwig Vollrath Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.v. & FSG Board / Steering Committee Frank Röske Porsche Leipzig GmbH & FSG Board / Steering Committee Ulf Steinfurth UAS Stralsund & FSG Steering Committee Michael Zottler TU Graz & FSG Operative Team Ronald Müller Rennteam Uni Stuttgart Jürgen Seidler TU Graz Cas Droogendijk TU Delft Barbara Schlögl Carbo Tech Composites GmbH & FSG Steering Committee Jan Helbig Europcar Autovermietung GmbH & FSG Steering Committee Henk Wapstra TU Delft Cas Droogendijk TU Delft Daniel Nowicki BMW Group Research & Development, FSG Judge Paul Daman BMW Group Research & Development, FSG Judge * No handout provided

2 Workshop BMW Munich IA / IAD & SEF IA / IAD & SEF Die Reglementierungen für den Impact Attenuator (IA) und Structural Equivalency Form (SEF) werden stetig überarbeitet, um die Sicherheit der Fahrzeugführer und anderer Eventteilnehmer zu erhöhen. Impact Attenuator (IA) / Impact Attenuator Data (IAD) Für 2009 ergeben sich gemäß Punkt 3.20 in den Abmaßen und der Art der Befestigung für den IA keine Änderungen gegenüber Dagegen wurden die Anforderungen für den Impact Attenuator Data Requirement (IAD) erhöht. Es muss ein Impact Attenuator Data Requirement (IAD) eingereicht werden, der den Nachweis erbringt, dass der IA die geforderten Beschleunigungen im Mittelwert von 20g und ein einmaliges Maximum von max. 40g erreicht. Ab 2009 sind bei der FSG Kalkulationen und / oder Simulationen als Nachweis für den IAD nicht zulässig. Es müssen reale Tests durchgeführt werden und die Auswertung der Tests muss einem ingenieurmäßigen Stil aufweisen (Inhaltsverzeichnis, Versuchsaufbau, Messwerte, Auswertung etc.). Der Aufbau der Crashbox ist zu beschreiben und die Crashbox ist vor und nach dem Crash zu fotografieren. Dazu sind Messschriebe in der Form & x& = f(t) einzureichen und die o.g. Beschleunigungen gemäß Rule zu berechnen. Zum Scrutineering beim Event in Hockenheim 2009 ist die gecrashte Box als Nachweis vorzuzeigen. Structural Equivalency Form (SEF) Jedes Team muss einen SEF einreichen unabhängig davon, ob die Materialvorgaben eingehalten werden oder nicht. Dazu wird das entsprechende Formblatt demnächst zum Download bereitgestellt. In 2009 keine Materialvorgabenänderung gegenüber Wenn NOTE 2 angewandt wird, muss für diese Anwendung kein SEF eingereicht werden. Es muss lediglich auf dem Formblatt vermerkt werden. Bei Materialauswahl gemäß 3.5 (Alternative Steel Tubing) unbedingt NOTE 1 bis NOTE 3 beachten. Vergleichswerkstoff für FSG 2009 ist bei allen Berechnungen S 235 (St 37-2). Für FSG 2009 bei Verwendung alternativen Materialien muss der SEF einen ingenieurmäßigen Stil aufweisen (Inhaltsverzeichnis, Formelzeichen, Abkürzungen, Materialnormen, Berechnungen mit Zwischenschritten, Auswertungen) Für FSG 2009 bei alternativen Materialien zusätzlich Erläuterung der Ergebnisse. Referent: Ulf Steinfurth steinfurth@formulastudent.de

3 Workshop BMW Munich Testing & Setup Check, Check and Double-Check Trouble-Shooting Understand your car Improve reliability Monitoring the operating reliability Basic Setup Setup Change: Was it good or bad? Driver Training Feedback via lap time Help from an experienced driver Basically: No locking or spinning wheels, smooth motions Fix rough parameter E.g.: final drive, ground clearance, break balance, Change only one parameter Special Setup Acceleration Skip pad Autocross Endurance Reduce driving resistance CG should be at the back TC / LC Setup (very good with tire data) 2nd run direct after 1st run (tire temp.) Test the complete Skid Pad Good for basic car setup 2nd after 1 st Different setup (tire temp.) No cones 2nd after 1 st Before competition test a hole endurance Restart Temp. oil / water Driver phys. / menth. Tactic ( safe fuel, treat car with care / push hard) Referent: Michael Zottler zottler@formulastudent.de

4 Formula Student Germany Workshop BMW Munich New Chassis Design Referent: Ronald Müller

5 Workshop BMW Munich Designing a Monocoque Making a monocoque in three steps Design The three ways you can design a monocoque Depending on the resources you have, it has to be your first decision before you start What you need to know before starting the design. Keep in mind. The monocoque has to be the connection of all components and modules your car consists of. The driver has to find a comfortable place to do his work. Its last function is to look fine The rule change concerning the patterns those have to fit into the car Analysis How you can simplify Sandwich composites Something about the distances between the outer plys (Example I-Beam) What kind of falsification do you have to deal with? How to set up ply stacking on example of torsion How to use a simple FE-analysis of an isotropic material for setting up a ply stacking What you can gather form failure criteria analysis What failure criteria should you use? Why? And what can learn form? Building The most common ways to manufacture a mold and a monocoque. Something about their advantages and disadvantages. Resin infusion Hand lay-up Prepregs Some examples for threaded inserts you can use. No final design is faultless. So what can you do if you have to screw something to your monocoque after all inserts have been set. Referent: Jürgen Seidler j.seidler@xentis.com

6 Workshop BMW Munich Fuel efficient dynamics How to build a fast car? Handling (2 sides: good driver training and an easy to drive/predictable car with good ergonomics) Fuel economy (you can gain up to 100 points and lose even more) Large GG diagram (good car set up, good tyres, braking power, accelerating power) If you have an unlimited financial budget and unlimited resources, there is still a trade off to make between: Handling, power and fuel economy: you can t get them all, but one of them could be less important than you would guess at first sight, see following paragraph. Looking at the power: actually we mean: accelerating power. So with a = F/m you can either gain F or lose m. By losing m, we gain more a than by increasing F. This is why: the lateral force capability of a tyre increases generally by a lower factor than the normal load (tyre load sensitivity). This loss in m also increases the handling response of the car. To increase fuel efficiency, you can limit power (and thereby also reduce car mass because of a possible lighter engine, driveline and auxiliary systems) and after that, make the engine as fuel efficient as possible. So how many power is needed? Does more power always make you faster? About 85% of the time the car has > 0.2g lateral. Only 15% of the time the car has full throttle. Compared to other formula classes, at FS power is relatively less important, or to put it differently, other factors (like fuel eco, suspension set up, cost analysis, etc.) are more important. A simplified calculation indicates that having a 30% power/weight ratio advantage, makes you probably only a few percent faster around the track, but gaining extra fuel economy points. How to distribute the power? Question yourself if you want an engine delivering a flat torque curve with less shifting around the track, or do you tune the engine to a power peak, making more shifting necessary. Analyse the typical corner exit speeds experienced at FS and make sure you are in a drivable range of your engine. Engine choice There are many factors to take into account choosing an engine, but here are some efficiency related differences between one cylinder engines and four cylinder engines: Less mechanical losses in one cylinders (less rotating parts) One cylinders have a better surface/volume ratio, and therefore a better thermodynamic efficiency 4 cyl engine parts are designed for delivering more power (restrictor does limits 4 cyl. Not 1 cyl 450 cc) Lower mass (450 cc weighs 29 kg) and less parts How can we design the engine fuel efficient? The following efficiencies determine the chemical to mechanical energy conversion: Thermodynamic efficiency (fuel choice, AFR, combustion chamber design, ignition, compression ratio) Volumetric efficiency (intake and exhaust design, camshaft design/choice, forced induction) Mechanical efficiency (engine oil, piston rings) Pumping efficiency (compressor, cooling water, alternator) Conclusion In the trade off: handling/fuel economy/power, you have to question how much power you need. First of all make you car handle, than you make your car deliver the desired power, and after that, make your car fuel efficient. Look at your resources and decide which modifications are really needed. After all only about 50% of the cars finish endurance, and only good management makes all effort of designing a fuel efficient car worth it. Referent: Cas Droogendijk, DUT Racing

7 Workshop BMW Munich Business Plan Presentation Rules Business Plan Presentation Event (75 points) Convince the executive board (your judges) to invest in your concept Adapted scoring sheet: Executive Summary 5 Content 20 Deep Dive Topic 10 Organisation 10 Visual Aids 10 Delivery 10 Questions 10 Max. points from judge 75 Executive Summary: Deadline: June 12, :00 CET NEW - Deep Dive Topic: Every team has to present this special deep dive topic in a detailed way as a part of the team s business plan presentation to the judges. Scoring: 1 st Place: 75 points 2 nd Place: 74 points 3 rd Place: 73 points 4 th Place: 72 points 5 th Place: 71 points Formula for non-finalists: PRESENTATION SCORE = 70 x (P your /P max ) P max is the highest score awarded to any team not participating in the finals P your is the score awarded to your team Referent: Barbara Schlögl schloegl@formulastudent.de

8 Workshop BMW Munich Formula for success What is the formula for success? Because of the different interests and resources of the different FS teams, there is no real formula for success, other than good project management. Product management The product management is used to manage the construction and operation of the car. We converted the System Engineering approach to a methodology more useful for a FS car, containing the following main phases: The top level phase o The process input / assignment by the competition (next year there will change a lot here), the university and the team o The top level requirements o The design philosophy, which states priorities in your top level requirements The concept phase o Market analysis, where do you get your information o Trade offs using the requirements The design phase o Work break down structure, to make sure no part will be left out o Load cases o Design synthesis, creating a physical structure o Documentation o Design loop The production/assembly phase, verification is important The operation phase, also important to verify, and especially to identify the source of the error There are some tools to guide this process, eg.: Data, Part, Risk, Performance/quality, Financial management and Time management. Special attention needs to be paid to the integration between the different departments within the team. Team management As said before, the team structure will differ significantly withing Formula Student, depending on the different resources and interests. However, one factor will be important within every successful team: motivation. This is accomplished by: Fist: assessing the members. Get to know the different qualities (eg. By making excersises) and give them tasks matching their qualities. This is a continuous process, and will take a lot of the manager s time. Second: educate and challenge your members. And last but not least: take care of a good communication. Referent: Henk Wapstra, Cas Droogendijk, DUT Racing