Feedback der Veranstaltungsevaluation - SS 2011 Optimization Dr. Khaled Elbassioni, Anke van Zuylen Kontakt: qualis@mx.uni-saarland.de
Allgemeine Informationen Informationen zum Projekt Qualis => Qualis ist ein aus allgemeinen Studiengebühren finanziertes Evaluationsprojekt, das am Lehrstuhl für Differentielle Psychologie und psychologische Diagnostik angesiedelt ist => Evaluiert werden Lehrveranstaltungen in den folgenden Studiengängen/Einrichtungen: Computerlinguistik, Erziehungswissenschaft, Informatik, Medizin, Pharmazie, Psychologie, Sprachenzentrum, Zentrum für Schlüsselkompetenzen Informationen zu den Qualis-Evaluationsbögen => Der Basisbogen besteht aus 28 Items, einer Freitextantwort sowie Fragen zu demographischen Variablen => Die Items des Basisbogens werden bei der Auswertung zu fünf Skalen (Dozent, Aufbau, Thema, Anforderungen, Gesamteinschätzung) aufsummiert und in Form dieser Skalenwerte rückgemeldet. Freitextantworten werden den Dozenten in ihrem originalen Wortlaut übermittelt => Entsprechend jeweils vorliegender Veranstaltungsspezifika wird der Basisbogen um zusätzliche Skalenmodule (z.b. Referate, Arbeitsaufträge) ergänzt. Das Qualis-Team dankt allen Studierenden und Dozenten für die zahlreiche und umfassende Teilnahme!
Allgemeine Angaben N=25 Alter Geschlecht 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% <20 20-21 22-23 24-25 >25 w m
Dozent Veranstaltung Referenz 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% vollkommen gar nicht
Aufbau Veranstaltung Referenz 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% vollkommen gar nicht
Thema Veranstaltung Referenz 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% vollkommen gar nicht
Anforderung Veranstaltung Referenz 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% vollkommen gar nicht
Gesamteinschätzung Veranstaltung Referenz 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% vollkommen gar nicht
Mittelwertvergleiche Veranstaltung Referenz Skala M SD M SD Dozent 1,6 0,43 1,92 0,71 Aufbau 1,86 0,6 2,19 0,89 Thema 1,81 0,8 2,08 0,88 Anforderung 2,08 0,69 2,48 0,91 Gesamteinschätzung 1,95 0,64 2,36 0,93
Dozent The lecturer was enthusiastic and motivated. 21 4 0 0 0 M= 1,16 SD= 0,37 I was able to follow the pace of the lecturer. 10 12 2 1 0 M= 1,76 SD= 0,78 The lecturer provided a good learning and working atmosphere. 16 6 3 0 0 M= 1,48 SD= 0,71 The lecturer has always been well prepared. 10 10 5 0 0 M= 1,8 SD= 0,76
Dozent The lecturer was very competent. 13 10 2 0 0 M= 1,68 SD= 0,63 The lecturer was able to put complicated ideas across. 12 11 1 0 1 M= 1,68 SD= 0,9 It was important to the lecturer that the participants benefitted from the course. 12 13 0 0 0 M= 1,52 SD= 0,51 The lecturer motivated the participants. 13 10 2 0 0 M= 1,68 SD= 0,63
Aufbau The learning objective was made clear. 12 9 3 1 0 M= 1,84 SD= 0,8 The educational objectives were well defined from the beginning. 15 8 1 1 0 M= 1,8 SD= 0,71 The course was well structured and comprehensible. 14 6 4 1 0 M= 2 SD= 0,76 The structure of the content was logical/easy to follow. 10 10 5 0 0 M= 1,8 SD= 0,76
Thema I was already interested in the subject of the course before I signed up for it. 11 8 3 3 0 M= 1,92 SD= 1,04 I believe that I learned important facts during the course. 10 10 5 0 0 M= 1,8 SD= 0,76 The topic of the course is relevant for the work of a computer scientist. 14 5 5 1 0 M= 1,72 SD= 0,94
Anforderung The difficulty of the content was adequate. 14 7 3 1 0 M= 1,92 SD= 0,76 The amount of the content was adequate. 13 7 4 1 0 M= 1,96 SD= 0,79 The requirements of the course were adequate. 13 8 2 2 0 M= 1,72 SD= 0,94 The amount of time required for the course as a whole (including preparation and follow-up) was appropriate. 10 10 3 2 0 M= 1,88 SD= 0,93
Anforderung The course was too difficult for me. 8 8 4 3 2 M= 3,08 SD= 1,15
Gesamteinschätzung Overall, this was a good course. 11 12 2 0 0 M= 1,64 SD= 0,64 I learned a lot in this course. 9 9 6 0 0 M= 1,88 SD= 0,8 k.a.= 1 The course fulfilled my expectations. 13 8 3 1 0 M= 1,88 SD= 0,78 I would recommend the course. 15 5 5 0 0 M= 1,6 SD= 0,82
Gesamteinschätzung In terms of its quality, this course was as good as the best course I have ever attended. 10 6 4 3 2 M= 2,72 SD= 1,14
Anmerkungen "more examples & real-world applications. Only a few students can follow the abstract notation." "very useful course :)" "Anke was great, Khaled should speak a little slower and more clearly" "Some more practical computer science problems formulation would help. Overall nice" "Maybe lose less time in simple examples and instead dedicate more to the complicated stuff" "I liked the lecture notes uploaded. Thank you very much."