Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov,

Transkript

1 FRIEDRICH ALEXANDER UNIVERSITÄT ERLANGEN NÜRNBERG FACHBEREICH WIRTSCHAFTS WISSENSCHAFTEN Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Postfach Nürnberg Herr Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov persönlich/vertraulich Der Studiendekan Prof. Dr. Karl Wilbers Lange Gasse 0, 900 Nürnberg Raum.6 Telefon Fax wiwi-studiendekan@fau.de Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation zur Veranstaltung Management and organization theories through the lens of mission-driven organizations Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov, anbei erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation im Sommersemester 06 zur Veranstaltung: Management and organization theories through the lens of mission-driven organizations Für die Ergebnisse aller Items werden je nach Fragetyp die Anzahl und Verteilung der Antworten, der Mittelwert, der Median sowie die Standardabweichung angegeben. Anschließend werden die Antworten auf die offenen Fragen aufgelistet. Bei Veranstaltungen mit einem Rücklauf von weniger als acht Fragebögen werden die offenen Antworten manuell anonymisiert (keine Darstellung der handschriftlichen Angaben). Falls dies bei Ihrer Veranstaltung der Fall ist, achten Sie bitte bei der Interpretation Ihrer Ergebnisse auf die verringerte Aussagekraft der statistischen Auswertungen. Auf der letzten Seite des Auswertungsberichts ist eine Profillinie dargestellt, die den Mittelwert zu den Skalafragen zeichnet. Diese eignet sich zur Präsentation der Ergebnisse in der Lehrveranstaltung sowie zur Veröffentlichung der Ergebnisse im StudOn-Ordner zur Lehrveranstaltung (sofern vorhanden). Gerne nehmen wir Ihre Verbesserungsvorschläge und Kommentierungen zum Verfahren auf. Vielen Dank für Ihre Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Prof. Dr. Karl Wilbers HAUSANSCHRIFT Lange Gasse Nürnberg TELEFON Telefax INTERNET BANKVERBINDUNG Staatsoberkasse Landshut Bayerische Landesbank München Konto (BLZ )

2 Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov Management and organization theories through the lens of mission-driven organizations Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov Globalwerte Globalindikator - + mw=, s=0,8 - mw=, s=0,8. Planning and Presentation + - mw=,6 s=0,6. Interaction with Students + - mw=,9 s=. Competence development + Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Mittelwert Median Fragetext Linker Pol 5% 5 5% Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert md=median s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm 5. Planning and Presentation.) I was able to follow the lecturer in the English language well,% 95,7% n= mw=,9 md= s=0,.) The seminar is structured clearly % 6% 6 n=5 mw=,6 md= s=0,6.) The content is aligned with clearly defined learning objectives % 6% n=5 mw=, md= s=0,9.) Other lectures are put in context,%,8% 0,% 0,% n= mw=,9 md= s=0,9 E.=.5) The research context is considered (methods, developments, projects, results),5% 8,% 5 7,% n= mw= md= s=0,8 E.=.6) The lecturer links theory and practice (examples, guest lectures, etc.) 8,% 8,%,% 5 n= mw=, md=,5 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 .7) The seminar is a good mix of knowledge transfer and discussion,%,% 9,% 5,% n= mw=, md= s=0,8.8) The teaching materials used during the seminar (e.g. slides, scripts, StudOn) help to understand the content better 8,% 0,8% 0,8% 5 n= mw=, md=,5 s=.9) The content-related previous know-how of the students participating in the seminar differ. How could the lecturer better deal with this problem?. Interaction with Students.) The lecturer is friendly and open-minded towards his students,% 95,8% n= mw= md= s=0,.) The lecturer motivates to ask questions and responds to them in detail 0,8% 79,% n= mw=,8 md= s=0,.) The students are supported well outside of the seminar (personally, electronically) 8,7% 0,% 60,9% n= mw=,5 md= s=0,7.) The lecturer supports the students thoroughly in their own performance 5% 5% 5 n= mw=, md=,5 s=0,8.5) The lecturer provides appropriate feedback 8,% 6,7% 6,7% 58,% n= mw=, md= s=. Competence development The seminar contributed to my competence development in the following aspects:.) Professional competence (e.g. specialist knowhow, professional problem solving methods) 8,% 0,8%,7% 9,% n= mw=,9 md= s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 .) Social competence (e.g. developing own positions in the professional context, giving reasons and presenting understandably) 8,%,5% 5,8%,% n= mw= md= s=0,9.) Personal competence (e.g. developing a realistic image of myself and taking consequences) 7,%,7%,8% 6,% n= mw=,7 md= s=, E.=. Challenge and Scope.) The degree of difficulty of the seminar is much too low 5,8%,7%,5% much too high n= mw=,7 md= s=0,7 5.) The scope of seminar contents is much too low 9,% 0,% 0,% much too high n= mw=,9 md= s=0,8 5.) The seminar speed is much too low 8,6% 7,% much too high n= mw=, md= s=0, 5.) The previous knowledge expected in the seminar is much too low 95,8%,% much too high n= mw= md= s=0, 5 5. Self-study Self-study is a form of study which takes place outside of courses. For example it includes preparation and follow-up course work, literature research and preparation of presentations. 5.) How much time did you spend for self-study for this lecture until now? Please specify in hours per week on average. 0.% 6.7% 0.8% more than 9.% n= 6. Global Lecture Assessment 6.) What grade do you assign the seminar in general? (very good) 0.8% (good).7% n= mw=,5 s=, (satisfactory) 6.7% (sufficient) 8.% 5 (insufficient) 8.% 6 (very insufficient).% EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 6.) I learned in the seminar very little,% % 6,% 9,% 7,% very much n= mw=,5 md= s=, 5 7. Socio-demographic Data and Background Variables 7.) What learning style do you prefer? Weekly consistent lerning. 5% n= I learn a short time before the exam. 6.7% A combination of both. 58.% 7.) The seminar's subject is interesting not at all 8,7%,7% 7,8%,7% a lot n= mw=,8 md= s=0,9 7.) How many seminars did you miss? none 5.8% n= to 5.% to more than 7.) Please state your programme of study Master Arbeitsmarkt & Personal n= Master in Economics Master FACT Master IBS 8.% Master IIS Master Management 8.% Master Marketing.% Master MiGG Master Sozialökonomik Master Wirtschafspädagogik other.% 7.5) I attended the seminar for the following reason: Mandatory n=5 Elective EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 7.6) For how many semesters (including the current semester) have you been participating in your study programme? 70.8%.% 5% >0 n= 8. Final questions Please write clearly and with a dark pen, to secure readability after scanning. 8.) What do you particularly like about the seminar? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5

7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 8.) What is bad about the seminar? Why? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

9 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

10 8.) What are your suggestions for improvement? What could be implemented from other seminars? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9

11 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 0

12 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

13 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) LVE FB WiWi Prof. Dr. Markus Beckmann und Dr. Dimitar Zvezdov Management and organization theories through the lens of mission-driven organizations Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert. Planning and Presentation.) I was able to follow the lecturer in the English language well n= mw=,9 md=,0 s=0,.) The seminar is structured clearly n=5 mw=,6 md=,0 s=0,6.) The content is aligned with clearly defined learning objectives n=5 mw=, md=,0 s=0,9.) Other lectures are put in context n= mw=,9 md=,0 s=0,9.5) The research context is considered (methods, developments, projects, results) n= mw=,0 md=,0 s=0,8.6) The lecturer links theory and practice (examples, guest lectures, etc.) n= mw=, md=,5 s=0,9.7) The seminar is a good mix of knowledge transfer and discussion n= mw=, md=,0 s=0,8.8) The teaching materials used during the seminar (e.g. slides, scripts, StudOn) help to understand the content better n= mw=, md=,5 s=,0. Interaction with Students.) The lecturer is friendly and open-minded towards his students n= mw=,0 md=,0 s=0,.) The lecturer motivates to ask questions and responds to them in detail n= mw=,8 md=,0 s=0,.) The students are supported well outside of the seminar (personally, electronically) n= mw=,5 md=,0 s=0,7.) The lecturer supports the students thoroughly in their own performance n= mw=, md=,5 s=0,8.5) The lecturer provides appropriate feedback n= mw=, md=,0 s=,0. Competence development.) Professional competence (e.g. specialist know-how, professional problem solving methods).) Social competence (e.g. developing own positions in the professional context, giving reasons and presenting understandably).) Personal competence (e.g. developing a realistic image of myself and taking consequences) n= mw=,9 md=,0 s=0,9 n= mw=,0 md=,0 s=0,9 n= mw=,7 md=,0 s=,. Challenge and Scope.) The degree of difficulty of the seminar is much too low much too high n= mw=,7 md=,0 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

14 .) The scope of seminar contents is much too low much too high.) The seminar speed is much too low much too high n= mw=,9 md=,0 s=0,8 n= mw=, md=,0 s=0,.) The previous knowledge expected in the seminar is much too low much too high n= mw=,0 md=,0 s=0, 6. Global Lecture Assessment 6.) I learned in the seminar very little very much n= mw=,5 md=,0 s=, 7. Socio-demographic Data and Background Variables 7.) The seminar's subject is interesting not at all a lot n= mw=,8 md=,0 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite