Der Kanzler. Auswertung Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation "HRM Research - Seminar" vom

Transkript

1 Der Kanzler Technische Universität Chemnitz Chemnitz Bearbeiter: Gebäude: Raum: Telefon: Fax: Internet: Katja Grobe Straße der Nationen Auswertung Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation "HRM Research - Seminar" vom Sehr geehrte Frau Kroll, als Anlage erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation zur Lehrveranstaltung "HRM Research - Seminar", die auf der Basis des Fragebogen-Typs "AVPE1" erstellt worden ist. Die Auswertung erfolgt dabei in Form von Balkendiagrammen und einer Profillinie, wobei der Wert 6 eine maximale Güte bzw. der Wert 1 eine minimale darstellt. Antworten auf offene Fragen werden nicht ausgewertet, sondern nur zusammenhängend angezeigt, wobei freigelassene Antwortfelder vom Administrator zwecks besserer Lesbarkeit der Auswertung bereits gelöscht wurden. Die Anzahl (n) der Befragten kann von Frage zu Frage unterschiedlich sein, da es sein kann, dass die Studierenden diese Frage nicht oder als vom Scanner "nicht interpretierbar" beantwortet haben. Weiterhin möchten wir darauf hinweisen, dass Antworten außerhalb des Textrahmens nicht vom System ausgewertet werden können. Bei Fragen oder Hinweise wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Mitarbeiterin Frau Grobe (HA oder per katja.grobe@verwaltung.tu-chemnitz.de). Mit freundlichen Grüßen Im Auftrag Anett Schweigert - Abteilung 4.1 / Studienprozessplanung - Dienst- u. Paketanschrift: Technische Universität Chemnitz Straße der Nationen Chemnitz Postanschrift: Technische Universität Chemnitz Chemnitz GERMANY Bankverbindung: Hauptkasse des Freistaates Sachsen Ostsächsische Sparkasse Dresden IBAN: DE BIC: OSDDDE81XXX

2 HRM Research - Seminar Erfasste Fragebögen =22 abgerufen am: Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Type of course: lecture 0% n=16 exercise 0% seminar 100% practice 0% The objectives of the course were obvious. mw=5,4,5 The course was clearly structured ("golden thread"). mw=5 s=0,9 The requirements regarding study performances and examinations were transparent. mw=4,9 s=1,1 During the course were taught subject-specific ways of thinking and working. mw=4,5 s=1,1 The presentation of the course with regard to written documents and illustrations were comprehensible. mw=5,1 E.=1 The media applied (board, flipchart, overhead, beamer etc.) were contributing to the comprehensibility of the learning contents of the course. mw=5,2 s=0,8 E.=1 The lecturer implemented the course in a diversified way. n=18 mw=4,7 s=1,2 E.=4 The lecturer taught the learning contents in a comprehensible way. n=16 mw=4,8 s=1,1 E.= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1

3 The lecturer was well prepared. n=18 mw=5,5 md=6 E.=4 The lecturer appeared competent during the course. n=17 mw=5,6 md=6 s=0,5 E.=3 The lecturer was speaking clearly. n=19 mw=5,6 md=6 s=0,6 E.=2 The course included examples for applications from practice. n=19 mw=5,5 md=6 E.=2 The course included current topics from research. mw=5,7 md=6 s=0,5 The course established trans-disciplinary interrelations. n=19 mw=5,2 s=0,8 E.=2 The lecture notes provided were supporting my work. n=12 mw=4,3 s=1,6 E.=3 Lecture notes were not provided. mw=1,8 md=2 s=0,4 However, lecture notes should be provided. n=5 mw=3,4 md=4 s=1,8 E.=5 All in all, I achieved to manage the workload for preparation and postprocessing of the course. n=16 mw=4,4 md=4 s=1, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 2

4 The workload for preparation and postprocessing per course event amounted hours by average. 0 0% 1 0% 2 19% % >3 57.1% The atmosphere during the course was characterized by mutual trust. mw=5,2 The lecturer was interested in the learning outcome of the students. mw=4,8 s=0,9 The lecturer was referring to the questions of the students in a decent way. mw=5 The tempo of the course was in my opinion... far too fast far too slow n=20 mw=3,2 md=3 s=0,4 The requirements of the course were in my opinion... far too low far too high mw=3,1 md=3 s=0,3 I learned a lot thanks to this course. no yes mw=4,3 md=4,5 s=1 I participated continuously in this course. no yes mw=4,6 s=1,2 I would recommend this course. no yes mw=4,6 s=1 E.= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 3

5 All in all, which mark would you give to this course? not sufficient very good mw=4,8 s=0,6 Gender: female 63.2% n=19 male 36.8% Subject-related semester: 1 5% n=20 2 0% 3 85% 4 5% 5 5% 6 0% >6 0% EvaSys Auswertung Seite 4

6 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Wirtschaftswissenschaften Professur Personal und Führung HRM Research - Seminar Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert The objectives of the course were obvious. mw=5,4,5 The course was clearly structured ("golden thread"). mw=5,0,0 s=0,9 The requirements regarding study performances and examinations were transparent. mw=4,9,0 s=1,1 During the course were taught subject-specific ways of thinking and working. mw=4,5,0 s=1,1 The presentation of the course with regard to written documents and illustrations were com-prehensible. mw=5,1,0 The media applied (board, flipchart, overhead, beamer etc.) were contributing to the comprehensibility of the learning contents of the course. mw=5,2,0 s=0,8 The lecturer implemented the course in a diversified way. n=18 mw=4,7,0 s=1,2 The lecturer taught the learning contents in a comprehensible way. n=16 mw=4,8,0 s=1,1 The lecturer was well prepared. n=18 mw=5,5 md=6,0 The lecturer appeared competent during the course. n=17 mw=5,6 md=6,0 s=0,5 The lecturer was speaking clearly. n=19 mw=5,6 md=6,0 s=0,6 The course included examples for applications from practice. n=19 mw=5,5 md=6,0 The course included current topics from research. mw=5,7 md=6,0 s=0,5 The course established trans-disciplinary interrelations. n=19 mw=5,2,0 s=0,8 The lecture notes provided were supporting my work. n=12 mw=4,3,0 s=1,6 Lecture notes were not provided. mw=1,8 md=2,0 s=0,4 However, lecture notes should be provided. n=5 mw=3,4 md=4,0 s=1, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5

7 All in all, I achieved to manage the workload for preparation and postprocessing of the course. n=16 mw=4,4 md=4,0 s=1,3 The atmosphere during the course was characterized by mutual trust. mw=5,2,0 The lecturer was interested in the learning outcome of the students. mw=4,8,0 s=0,9 The lecturer was referring to the questions of the students in a decent way. mw=5,0,0 The tempo of the course was in my opinion... far too fast far too slow n=20 mw=3,2 md=3,0 s=0,4 The requirements of the course were in my opinion... far too low far too high mw=3,1 md=3,0 s=0,3 I learned a lot thanks to this course. no yes mw=4,3 md=4,5 s=1,0 I participated continuously in this course. no yes mw=4,6,0 s=1,2 I would recommend this course. no yes mw=4,6,0 s=1,0 All in all, which mark would you give to this course? not sufficient very good mw=4,8,0 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen Name of the course EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

9 Study program EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

10 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9