Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Ähnliche Dokumente
Auswertungsbericht Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsbewertung Mobile Communication and Ad Hoc Networks

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

There are 10 weeks this summer vacation the weeks beginning: June 23, June 30, July 7, July 14, July 21, Jul 28, Aug 4, Aug 11, Aug 18, Aug 25

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

WS 2011/12 Web- und XML-Technologien Dozent(en): Dr. Stefan Lüttringhaus-Kappel

SELF-STUDY DIARY (or Lerntagebuch) GER102

Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft

UNIGRAZONLINE. With UNIGRAZonline you can organise your studies at Graz University. Please go to the following link:

Einsatz einer Dokumentenverwaltungslösung zur Optimierung der unternehmensübergreifenden Kommunikation

Notice: All mentioned inventors have to sign the Report of Invention (see page 3)!!!

SS 2011 Temporal Information Systems Dozent(en): Dr. Andreas Behrend

Corporate Digital Learning, How to Get It Right. Learning Café

Proseminar - Organisation und Personal Seminar Organisational Theory and Human Resource Management

Technische Universität Braunschweig Rebenring 58A Braunschweig Deutschland

1 von :07

Titelbild1 ANSYS. Customer Portal LogIn

p^db=`oj===pìééçêíáåñçêã~íáçå=

eurex rundschreiben 094/10

WP2. Communication and Dissemination. Wirtschafts- und Wissenschaftsförderung im Freistaat Thüringen

Prof. Dr. Dietrich von der Oelsnitz Seminar Personalmanagement (WW ) Erfasste Fragebögen = 11. Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen

Prof. Dr. Dietrich von der Oelsnitz Strategisches Projektmanagement (WW-ORGP-006) Erfasste Fragebögen = 28. Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen

USBASIC SAFETY IN NUMBERS

Algorithms for graph visualization

ELBA2 ILIAS TOOLS AS SINGLE APPLICATIONS

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Relationale Datenbanken Dr. Thomas Bode Average grade: 2.1

1. General information Login Home Current applications... 3

Studentische Veranstaltungskritik per Internet-Fragebogen

WS 13/14: Auswertung für Seminar Sportinformatik - Messtechnik, Algorithmen

Context-adaptation based on Ontologies and Spreading Activation

phone + 49 (0) fax + 49 (0) fk1@tu-braunschweig.de CFG-

Erläuterungen zu den Excel-Tabellen der Auswertungen zu Eduplan

Exercise (Part II) Anastasia Mochalova, Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Kath. Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt 1

Intercultural educations by Means of PArtners working with ECvet Transfer LdV (TOI): DE/10/LLP-LdV/TOI/147303

Tuesday 10 May 2011 Afternoon Time: 30 minutes plus 5 minutes reading time

Field Librarianship in den USA

Accounting course program for master students. Institute of Accounting and Auditing

2 German sentence: write your English translation before looking at p. 3

The poetry of school.

CHAMPIONS Communication and Dissemination

Parameter-Updatesoftware PF-12 Plus

GERMAN LANGUAGE COURSE SYLLABUS

Prof. Dr. Margit Scholl, Mr. RD Guldner Mr. Coskun, Mr. Yigitbas. Mr. Niemczik, Mr. Koppatz (SuDiLe GbR)

Login data for HAW Mailer, Emil und Helios

Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine BWL Strategisches und Internationales Management Prof. Dr. Mike Geppert Carl-Zeiß-Str Jena

Aufnahmeuntersuchung für Koi

Mul$media im Netz (Online Mul$media) Wintersemester 2014/15. Übung 02 (Nebenfach)

Getting started with MillPlus IT V530 Winshape

Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. Dr. Hendrik Drachsler

Universität Ulm Ulm Germany. Ansprechpartner in den Fakultäten siehe Fußzeile

Exercise (Part XI) Anastasia Mochalova, Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Kath. Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt 1

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik und Datenverarbeitung Rechenzentrum Süd. z/os Requirements 95. z/os Guide in Lahnstein 13.

-Which word (lines 47-52) does tell us that Renia s host brother is a pleasant person?

Im zweiten Teil werden die schriftlichen Anmerkungen der Freitexte ("offene Frage") dokumentiert.

Workshop Quality Assurance Forum 2014

SS 2015: Auswertung für Database Administration with Oracle

ONLINE LICENCE GENERATOR

Prediction Market, 28th July 2012 Information and Instructions. Prognosemärkte Lehrstuhl für Betriebswirtschaftslehre insbes.

Robotino View Kommunikation mit OPC. Communication with OPC DE/EN 04/08

Abteilung Internationales CampusCenter

Tuning des Weblogic /Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g. Jan-Peter Timmermann Principal Consultant PITSS

Software development with continuous integration

Challenges for the future between extern and intern evaluation

German Geography Cookie Unit Haley Crittenden Gordon German Teacher Lee High School & Key Middle School (adapted from Angelika Becker)

Quality Management is Ongoing Social Innovation Hans-Werner Franz

CABLE TESTER. Manual DN-14003

Darstellung und Anwendung der Assessmentergebnisse

Bewertungsbogen. Please find the English version of the evaluation form at the back of this form

BLK Quick Installation Guide. English. Deutsch

A Practical Approach for Reliable Pre-Project Effort Estimation

Leitfaden für die Erstellung eines individuellen Stundenplans mit UnivIS/ How to make up your individual timetable with UnivIS

Standardstufe 6: Interkulturelle kommunikative Kompetenz

Die ambulante Gesundheitsversorgung in der Schweiz ein Blick von Aussen

Frau/Herrn (PERSÖNLICH)

European Qualification Strategies in Information and Communications Technology (ICT)

WS11/12: Auswertung für Software Architecture (OSS-ARCH-TALK)

Wie bekommt man zusätzliche TOEFL-Zertifikate? Wie kann man weitere Empfänger von TOEFL- Zertifikaten angeben?

Students intentions to use wikis in higher education

Geometrie und Bedeutung: Kap 5

HIR Method & Tools for Fit Gap analysis

Open Source. Legal Dos, Don ts and Maybes. openlaws Open Source Workshop 26 June 2015, Federal Chancellery Vienna

KURZANLEITUNG. Firmware-Upgrade: Wie geht das eigentlich?

German Section 33 - Print activities

ALL1681 Wireless g Powerline Router Quick Installation Guide

Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine BWL Strategisches und Internationales Management Prof. Dr. Mike Geppert Carl-Zeiß-Str Jena

GRIPS - GIS basiertes Risikoanalyse-, Informations- und Planungssystem

miditech 4merge 4-fach MIDI Merger mit :

Franke & Bornberg award AachenMünchener private annuity insurance schemes top grades

Modulbeschreibung. Beitrag des Moduls zu den Studienzielen. Voraussetzungen für die Teilnahme. Verwendbarkeit des Moduls

USB Treiber updaten unter Windows 7/Vista

The Master of Science Entrepreneurship and SME Management

Transkript:

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Kaiserstrasse 76 Karlsruhe Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche (PERSÖNLICH) Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Mädche, mit diesem Schreiben erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Digital Service Design. Ihre Lehrveranstaltung Digital Service Design hat den Lehrqualitätsindex LQI = 00. Die Auswertung zu Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung gliedert sich in folgende Abschnitte: Zu Beginn der Auswertung werden die Ergebnisse der Befragung in Form von Häufigkeitstabellen dargestellt. Bei allen Fragen wird die Anzahl der abgegebenen Antworten (n) angezeigt. Bei den er- Skalafragen finden Sie zusätzlich neben dem Histogramm den Mittelwert (mw) und die Standardabweichung (s) der jeweiligen Frage. Neben manchen Fragen finden Sie zudem ein Ampelsymbol abgebildet. Diese Fragen dienen der Qualitätssicherung der Lehre. Im vorletzten Teil werden sämtliche er-skalenfragen in einem Profilliniendiagramm abgebildet. Zuletzt sind die Antworten zu den offenen Fragen aufgelistet. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ihr Evaluationsteam

Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche Digital Service Design (00) Erfasste Fragebögen = 6 Periode: WS6/7 Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Qualitätsindex Erklärung der Ampelsymbole Der Mittelwert liegt unterhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt im Toleranzbereich der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt innerhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie.. Questions Concerning the Lecture.) Why do you attend this course? Compulsory / optional compulsory course 66.7% Personal interest.% For repetition / specialization Studium Generale.) My commitment to this course is reflected by: (multiple choice) Regular attendance 0 Constant taking of notes 66.7% Active contributions 66.7% Regular studying at home Study group attendance Reading of the recommended literature 6.7% Work through scripts / materials from the lecturer Tutorial / exercise attendance Internet research.%.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is...,% mw=, s=0,.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? Very intensive,% Very small mw=, s=0, 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? Very clearly 6,7% 6,7% mw=, s=0,8.6) The course enhances (multiple choice) My practical competences 0 Transfer and application of the lessons learned to other contexts 66.7% My analytical capacities My own initiative My capacity to cooperate.% My independent working skills.%.7) I learn a lot during this course,% mw=,67 s=0,.8) The objectives and requirements of the course were outlined clearly. mw=, s=0,.9) The individual lectures achieve a clear objective.,% mw=, s=0,.0) Not only separate facts, but also relationships are conveyed. 0 mw= s=0.) The lecturer has used the aids (e.g. projector, blackboard) appropriately. mw=, s=0,.) Helpful work materials (e.g. references, internet learning platforms, lecture notes) were made available for the course. mw=, s=0, Handwritten comments may allow conclusions to be drawn with respect to your person. Disguise your writing or use printed letters to make this more difficult..) How large is the amount of work for this course? Very small 6,7% 6,7%,%,% Very large mw=,8 s=,7.) The amount of work required for this course is... Adequate,% 6,7%,% 6,7% Inadequate mw=, s=,.6) How is the course structured? Very well ly mw=, s=0, Please rate the lecture regarding the following aspects: 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

.7) Contents Very easy 6,7% 8,% Very difficult mw=,8 s=0,.8) Speed Too slow,% Too fast mw=, s=0,.9) Previous knowledge required Very little 6,7%,% Very much mw=, s=0,8.0) Clarity (helpful examples) Very clear,% 6,7% Very abstract mw=,67 s=0,8.) Were the complete lecture notes made available at least one week before the start of the course? Yes 8 n= No No lecture notes are provided.) Are the documents required for the lecture made available online at least two days prior to the date of the lecture? Yes 8.% No 6.7% There are no lecture documents.) I have looked at the lecture documents prior to the date of the lecture. Very carefully 6,7%,% mw=,7 s=0,7.) Please rate the course as a whole. mw=, s=0,.6) Are tutorials offered in addition to the lecture? Yes No 0. Questions Concerning the Room Conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is Appropriate 8,% 6,7% Inappropriate mw=,7 s=0,.) The acoustics in this room is 8,% 6,7% mw=,7 s=0, 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

.) View conditions in this room are 8,% 6,7% mw=,7 s=0,. Questions Concerning the Lecturer.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? very strongly 0 not at all mw= s=0.) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? very strongly,% not at all mw=, s=0,.) Does the lecturer present current research activities? Very strongly 8,% 6,7% mw=,7 s=0,.) Does the lecturer point out the connection between theory and practice?. Very strongly 8,% 6,7% mw=,7 s=0,.) The lecturer explains the matter well. mw=, s=0,.6) The lecturer speaks clearly and understandably. 8,% 6,7% mw=,7 s=0,.7) The lecturer plans the available time for the lecture well.,% mw=, s=0,. Questions Concerning the Studies.) Of the 0 lecture dates, I attend an average of about... 0- n= - -6 7-8 9-0 8 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

.) How many hours per week have you put, on average, into your preparation and follow-up for this course, so far? 0 h.% < h < h.% < h 6.7% < h < h 6.7% <6 h 6<7 h More than 7 h.) My understanding of the contents of the course is mainly obtained from (check as many as apply) Lecture 0 Exercise 6.7% Tutorial Lecture notes/ Transparencies 8.% Literature.% Internet Others.) What is your semester? (. semester in Master Degree = ) - 0 - -6 7-8 >8 n=.) Current study course InfoWirt (Master).% Wing (Master) 66.7%. Comments Thank you for your cooperation! (Infoportal zur Lehrevaluation: www.pst.kit.edu/eval-info) 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) 0. WS 06/7 Wirtschaftswissenschaften Prof. Dr. Alexander Mädche Digital Service Design Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert. Questions Concerning the Lecture.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is... mw=,.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? Very intensive Very small mw=,.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? Very clearly mw=,0.7) I learn a lot during this course mw=,67.8) The objectives and requirements of the course were outlined clearly. mw=,0.9) The individual lectures achieve a clear objective. mw=,.0) Not only separate facts, but also relationships are conveyed. mw=,00.) The lecturer has used the aids (e.g. projector, blackboard) appropriately. mw=,0.) Helpful work materials (e.g. references, internet learning platforms, lecture notes) were made available for the course..) How large is the amount of work for this course? Very small Very large.) The amount of work required for this course is... Adequate Inadequate.6) How is the course structured? Very well ly.7) Contents Very easy Very difficult.8) Speed Too slow Too fast.9) Previous knowledge required Very little Very much.0) Clarity (helpful examples) Very clear Very abstract mw=,0 mw=,8 mw=, mw=,0 mw=,8 mw=, mw=, mw=,67.) I have looked at the lecture documents prior to the date of the lecture. Very carefully mw=,7.) Please rate the course as a whole. mw=,0.7) If yes: a sufficient number of tutorials is offered. (*). Questions Concerning the Room Conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is Appropriate Inappropriate mw=,7.) The acoustics in this room is.) View conditions in this room are mw=,7 mw=,7 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

. Questions Concerning the Lecturer.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? very strongly not at all mw=,00.) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? very strongly not at all mw=,.) Does the lecturer present current research activities? Very strongly mw=,7.) Does the lecturer point out the connection between theory and practice?. Very strongly mw=,7.) The lecturer explains the matter well..6) The lecturer speaks clearly and understandably. mw=,0 mw=,7.7) The lecturer plans the available time for the lecture well. mw=,.8) The lecturer can be contacted also outside of the lecture (e.g. consultation hours) (*) 0.0.7 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7