Hochschuldidaktische Arbeitsstelle. Center for Development and Research in Higher Education. Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation. Silke Köhler, M.A.

Transkript

1 TU Darmstadt Hochschuldidaktische Arbeitsstelle Hochschulstr. 689 Darmstadt Hochschuldidaktische Arbeitsstelle Center for Development and Research in Higher Education Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation Silke Köhler, M.A. EvaSys Telefon: evaluation@hda.tu-darmstadt.de Dipl.-Soz. Franziska Zwirner Organisation & Koordination Telefon: evaluation@hda.tu-darmstadt.de Hochschuldidaktische Arbeitsstelle AB Evaluation S 0/ A Hochschulstraße 689 Darmstadt

2 Michael Eichberg Software Engineering - Design and Construction ( iv) Erfasste Fragebögen = 6 Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Auto-Gruppe FB 0 -Informatik- TU Darmstadt - Lecture and exercises evaluation Course name: Instructor: Semester: ws/ss. Personal Information.. What subject are you studying? Informatik 7.% n= CE.9% IST.8% WInf.9% Mathematik ETiT other.9%.. Degree sought? B.Sc./BA 6.% n=6 M.Sc./MA 6.9% Lehramt/BEd/MEd Diplom/Magister Other (doctoral, etc.).. Semester?.-..% n= % % %.. Gender female.9% n= male 9.%.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 .6. In which country did you obtain your university admission? in Germany 8.9% n= in another country 7.%. The lecture.. I attended the lecture... % of the time: n=6 6.6% 7.6% 8.% 9 8.9% 0 7.8%.. For which reasons did you not attend the lecture regularly? (more than one answer possible) Time overlap with other lectures.9% n=6 low quality of past lectures.8% personal reasons (e.g. illness).% external circumstances (domicile,weather...).% other reasons:.8% Note: If you can't or do not want to answer a question, please mark "n.a." (= not applicable)... The content of the course is well-structured and easy to follow..%.%.8%.9% n= mw=.76 s=0.78.%.9%.%.%.. The learning objectives of the course are clear. n= mw=.8 s=.0.6. The instructor is able to explain complex concepts and issues clearly..%.7%.6%.6%.8% n=6 mw=.8 s= %.7%.9%.9%.7. Examples are used to clearly illustrate concepts. n= mw=.7 s=0.9 9.%.%.% 6.%.8. The lecturer referred to current research. n= mw=. s=0.99 E.=.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 .9. The connection between theory and practice was established..% 8.%.8%.9%.9% n= mw=.9 s=.0.%.%.%.0. The speed of the lecture was adequate. n= mw=.9 s=0.97.0a If the speed of the lecture was not adequate: too fast 0 n=9 too slow 8.% 8.%.8%.8%.8%.. The lecturer was well prepared. n=6 mw=. s= The instructor is able to respond appropriately to student questions and contributions. 7%.8%.% n= mw=. s= %.%.. The lecturer could be reached outside the lecture. n= mw=. s=0.8 E.=7.. The instructor is able to motivate students to participate and engage with course themes. 6.%.%.%.9%.9% n= mw=.8 s=.. The lecture motivated me to occupy myself with the topics on my own..%.%.%.9%.9% n= mw=. s= The teaching aids (scripts, textbooks, references to the literature, slides) supported my studies effectively..%.% 9.% 6.% n= mw=.9 s=.08 E.= Auto-Gruppe How would you rate the lecture (without exercises)?.9%.%.9%.9% very good insufficient n= mw=.9 s=0.8 FB 0 -Informatik- TU Darmstadt - Lecture and Exercises Evaluation. Assessment of the exercises (only for lectures with exercises).0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 .. I attended the exercises... % of the time:.9% n= 8.8%.9%.7%.9%.9% 6.9% 7.9% 8.8% 9 8.8% 0.%.. What were your reasons for not attending? (more than one answers possible) time overlap with other lectures.7% n=6 low quality of past lectures.% private reasons (e.g. illness).% external circumstances (domicile,weather...) 6.7% other reasons:.8% 9%.%.8% 6.%.%.. The exercises were clearly structured. n= mw=.9 s=.0 E.= 9% 8.%.9% 9.7%.. I learned a lot through the exercises and assignments. n= mw=.0 s=0.9 E.=.9%.% 8.7% 6.%.6. The exercises were very motivating. n= mw=.8 s=0.9 E.=.8% 8.% 8.%.8%.7%.7. The teaching assistant did a good job. n=7 mw=. s=.0 E.=6.8. The topics of the exercises were always well coordinated with the topics of the lecture. 6.7%.% 6.7%.% n=0 mw=.9 s=.09 E.=.9. The lecturer used electronic plattforms (forums, mailing lists, wikis, websites) in a reasonable and helpful way. 9.% 8.6% 8.6%.6% n=8 mw=.96 s=0.9 E.=6.% 7.9% 0.% 7.%.0. The ratio of students to teaching staff was adequate. n=9 mw=. s=.08 E.=6.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 .8% 8.%.. The size of the group was adequate. n= mw=.86 s=0.7 E.=.%.%.%.9%.. The room was suitable for working and learning. n=7 mw=. s=0.9 E.=.8%.8%.%.8%.%.. The level of the exercises was adequate. n=9 mw=.8 s=.0 E.=.a If the level of the exercise was not adequate: too high 0 n= too low.. The exercises (homework, tests) were well organized throughout the semester. 7.6% 8.% 7.% 6.9% n=9 mw=.0 s=0.87 E.= 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7%.%.. The lecturer provided enough exercise material. n=0 mw=.0 s=0.96 E.= How would you rate the exercise? 6.7%.% 6.7%.% very good insufficient n=0 mw=.7 s=0.67. General assessment of the lecture and exercises.. In addition to visiting the lectures and the exercises/assignments I spent the following number of hours per week on solving the exercises: 0.9% n=.7%.%.7%, 8.6%.%.% 6-0.7% - 8.6% >0.9%.% 7.%.%.% %.. My previous knowledge allowed me to follow the lecture. n= mw= s=.7 E.=.%.7% 7.%.7%.. I would recommend this lecture to a friend. n= mw=.77 s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

7 Auto-Gruppe I would give the course the following overall grade: 9.% 8.%.% very good insufficient n= mw=.7 s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 Profillinie Teilbereich: FB 0 Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Michael Eichberg Software Engineering - Design and Construction. The lecture.. The content of the course is well-structured and easy to follow... The learning objectives of the course are clear..6. The instructor is able to explain complex concepts and issues clearly..7. Examples are used to clearly illustrate concepts..8. The lecturer referred to current research..9. The connection between theory and practice was established..0. The speed of the lecture was adequate... The lecturer was well prepared... The instructor is able to respond appropriately to student questions and contributions... The lecturer could be reached outside the lecture... The instructor is able to motivate students to participate and engage with course themes... The lecture motivated me to occupy myself with the topics on my own..6. The teaching aids (scripts, textbooks, references to the literature, slides) supported my studies effectively. n= mw=.76 n= mw=.8 n=6 mw=.8 n= mw=.7 n= mw=. n= mw=.9 n= mw=.9 n=6 mw=. n= mw=. n= mw=. n= mw=.8 n= mw=. n= mw=.9 Auto-Gruppe How would you rate the lecture (without exercises)? very good insufficient n= mw=.9. Assessment of the exercises (only for lectures with exercises).. The exercises were clearly structured... I learned a lot through the exercises and assignments..6. The exercises were very motivating..7. The teaching assistant did a good job..8. The topics of the exercises were always well coordinated with the topics of the lecture..9. The lecturer used electronic plattforms (forums, mailing lists, wikis, websites) in a reasonable and helpful way..0. The ratio of students to teaching staff was adequate. n= mw=.9 n= mw=.0 n= mw=.8 n=7 mw=. n=0 mw=.9 n=8 mw=.96 n=9 mw=..0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

9 .. The size of the group was adequate... The room was suitable for working and learning... The level of the exercises was adequate... The exercises (homework, tests) were well organized throughout the semester... The lecturer provided enough exercise material. How would you rate the exercise? very good insufficient n= mw=.86 n=7 mw=. n=9 mw=.8 n=9 mw=.0 n=0 mw=.0 n=0 mw=.7. General assessment of the lecture and exercises.. My previous knowledge allowed me to follow the lecture... I would recommend this lecture to a friend. n= mw= n= mw=.77 Auto-Gruppe I would give the course the following overall grade: very good insufficient n= mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

10 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen. Personal Information.. If other, please specify:. The lecture.. Other reasons for not attending the lecture regularly:.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9

11 . Assessment of the exercises (only for lectures with exercises).. Other reasons for not attending the exercises regularly:. General assessment of the lecture and exercises.. What did you especially like in this lecture and excercise?.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 0

12 .0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

13 .. What did you especially dislike in this lecture and excercise or what improvemnts do you suggest?.0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

14 .0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

15 .0.0 EvaSys Auswertung Seite