Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Transkript

1 Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Kaiserstrasse 76 Karlsruhe Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Sehr geehrte Frau Dr. Kaori Nagato-Plum (PERSÖNLICH) Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden Sehr geehrte Frau Dr. Nagato-Plum, mit diesem Schreiben erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Advanced Mathematics III (Lecture). Ihre Lehrveranstaltung Advanced Mathematics III (Lecture) hat den Lehrqualitätsindex LQI = 00. Die Auswertung zu Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung gliedert sich in folgende Abschnitte: Zu Beginn der Auswertung werden die Ergebnisse der Befragung in Form von Häufigkeitstabellen dargestellt. Bei allen Fragen wird die Anzahl der abgegebenen Antworten (n) angezeigt. Bei den er- Skalafragen finden Sie zusätzlich neben dem Histogramm den Mittelwert (mw) und die Standardabweichung (s) der jeweiligen Frage. Neben manchen Fragen finden Sie zudem ein Ampelsymbol abgebildet. Diese Fragen dienen der Qualitätssicherung der Lehre. Im vorletzten Teil werden sämtliche er-skalenfragen in einem Profilliniendiagramm abgebildet. Zuletzt sind die Antworten zu den offenen Fragen aufgelistet. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ihr Evaluationsteam

2 Dr. Kaori Nagato-Plum Advanced Mathematics III (Lecture) (060000) Erfasste Fragebögen = Periode: WS6/7 Dr. Kaori Nagato-Plum, Advanced Mathematics III (Lecture) Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Qualitätsindex Erklärung der Ampelsymbole Der Mittelwert liegt unterhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt im Toleranzbereich der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt innerhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie.. Questions relating to Lectures.) My commitment to this course is reflected by: (multiple choice) regular attendance 90.% constant taking of notes 76.% active contributions 9% regular studying at home.% study group attendance 9% reading of the recommended literature.% work through scripts/materials 8.% tutorial/exercise attendance 90.% internet research.% n=.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive,8% 7,%,%,8% very small n= mw=,8 s=0,67.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much,8% 7,6%,8%,8% n= mw=, s=0,8.) Why do you attend this course? compulsory/ optional compulsory course 8% n= personal interest.8% for repetiton/specialization.% Studium Generale.8%..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 .) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is % % n=0 mw=,9 s=0,76 How applicable are the following statements to you?.6) Aims and requirements of the lecture are cleary formulated. 8,%,% 9,% no, n= mw=,7 s=0,6.7) The design (with regard to contents) of the lecture was comprehensible to me. 7,6%,9% 9,% no, n= mw=,6 s=0,67.8) The relevance of the topics was made clear.,%,% 9,%,8% no, n= mw=,9 s=0,9.9) The presentation (on blackboard or the like) was clear. 7,6%,% no, n= mw=, s=0,.0) The presentation (on blackboard or the like) was legible. 6,9% 8,% no, n= mw=,8 s=0,.) The lecture stimulated my interest in the subject. 9% 7,6%,8%,8%,8% no, n= mw=,9 s=,0.) I felt free to bring in questions and comments. 6,9% 8,6% 9,% no, n= mw=,8 s=0,68.) The knowledge gain was... very high,8% 66,7% 9,% very small n= mw=,86 s=0,7 Please rate the lecture regarding the following aspects:.) Contents very easy % % very difficult n=0 mw=, s=0,76.) Previous knowledge required very little,8%,% 8,%,8% very much n= mw=,8 s=0,87.6) Clarity (by helpful examples) very clear,%,8%,8% 9% very abstract n= mw=,9 s=,.7) Suitability of teaching and learning materials if offered 8,6%,9% 8,6% n= mw= s=0,77..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 .8) How often did you participate in the lecture? 0-% % - % 0-7% % 7-0 6% n=0.9) How many hours per week have you put, on average, into your preparation and follow-up for this course, so far? none n= < h 9.% < h.% < h.8% < h 9.% < h 9.% <6 h.8% 6<7 h.8% 7 h and more.8%.0) My knowledge of the contents of the lecture mainly results from (multiple answers possible) lecture 76.% n= exercise course 6.9% tutorial 90.% lecture notes 66.7% literature.8% internet 8.% others Please rate the following criteria:.) The amount of topics was... too small,8% 8%,% too big n= mw=, s=0,.) The requirements of the lecture on me were -... too low,8% 66,7% 8,6% too high n= mw=,9 s=0,68.) The speed was... too slow 9,%,8% too fast n= mw=,0 s=0,.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly 8,%,9%,%,8% n= mw=,86 s=0,8..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 .) The course enhances (multiple choice) my practical competences 7.% n= transfer and application of the lessons learned to other contexts.9% my analytical capacities 6.9% my own initiative 8.% my capacity to cooperate.8% my independent working skills 7.%.6) I learn a lot during this course completely true n=0 mw=,9 s=0,7. Questions concerning room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate 9% 8,% 9%,8% 9% inappropriate n= mw=,67 s=,9.) The acoustics in this room is,8% 8,%,%,8% n= mw=,9 s=0,87.) View conditions in this room are,8% 9%,9% 9,%,8% n= mw=, s=,. Questions concerning the lecturer.) Does the lecturer present current research activities?,%,6% 6,8%,%,% n=9 mw=, s=,07.) Does the lecturer point out the connection between theory and practice? 6 % % n=0 mw=,6 s=0,99. Questions relating to the studies.) Current study course: Bachelor Mathematics % n=0 Master Mathematics Master Economathematics Master TeMa Teaching degree Diploma Mathematics Diploma Economathematics Diploma TeMa Others 9%..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 .) What is your semester? - n=0-9% -6 % 7-8 >8.) Did you attend one or several of the following prep or in-depth courses? (multiple answers are permitted) prep course mathematics MINT-Kolleg courses.8% none 8% n=. Comments Anonymity cannot be guaranted for handwritten comments. Please, disguise your writing style, if necessary. 6. Monitoring 6.) Please rate the course as a whole,9% 8,%,%,8% n= mw=,8 s=0,87 6.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small 9,% 7,%,8% 9,% very large n= mw=, s=0,8 6.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate inadequate n=0 mw=, s=0,8 6.) How is the course structured? very well 8,6%,% 9% ly n= mw=,9 s=0,7 6.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? 76,%,8% n= mw=, s=0, 6.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? 76,%,8% n= mw=, s=0, Thank you for your cooperation! For more information see: EvaSys Auswertung Seite

7 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) 0. WS 06/7 Mathematik Dr. Kaori Nagato-Plum Advanced Mathematics III (Lecture) Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert. Questions relating to Lectures.) How do you assess the participation of your colleagues in the course? very intensive very small n= mw=,8.) How much do you enjoy attending this course? very much n= mw=,0.) Coordination of the contents of this course with that of other courses in my curriculum is n=0 mw=,9.6) Aims and requirements of the lecture are cleary formulated. no, n= mw=,7.7) The design (with regard to contents) of the lecture was comprehensible to me. no, n= mw=,6.8) The relevance of the topics was made clear. no, n= mw=,90.9) The presentation (on blackboard or the like) was clear. no, n= mw=,.0) The presentation (on blackboard or the like) was legible. no, n= mw=,8.) The lecture stimulated my interest in the subject. no, n= mw=,9.) I felt free to bring in questions and comments. no, n= mw=,8.) The knowledge gain was... very high very small n= mw=,86.) Contents very easy very difficult n=0 mw=,.) Previous knowledge required very little very much n= mw=,8.6) Clarity (by helpful examples) very clear very abstract n= mw=,9.7) Suitability of teaching and learning materials if offered n= mw=,00.) The amount of topics was... too small too big n= mw=,0.) The requirements of the lecture on me were -... too low too high n= mw=,9.) The speed was... too slow too fast n= mw=,0.) Do you understand the importance of the course contents to your further studies? very clearly n= mw=,86.6) I learn a lot during this course completely true n=0 mw=,90. Questions concerning room conditions.) The size of the room in comparison to the number of course participants is appropriate inappropriate n= mw=,67.) The acoustics in this room is n= mw=,9..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 .) View conditions in this room are n= mw=,. Questions concerning the lecturer.) Does the lecturer present current research activities? n=9 mw=,.) Does the lecturer point out the connection between theory and practice? n=0 mw=,60 6. Monitoring 6.) Please rate the course as a whole 6.) How large is the the amount of work for this course? very small very large 6.) The amount of work required for this course is... adequate inadequate 6.) How is the course structured? very well ly n= mw=,8 n= mw=, n=0 mw=,0 n= mw=,90 6.) Does the lecturer appear dedicated and motivated during the course? n= mw=, 6.6) Is the lecturer responsive to questions and concerns of the students? n= mw=,..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

9 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen. Comments.) Do you have suggestions for improvement concerning the organisation of the lecture (e.g. exercise courses, tutorials...).) Remarks concerning the lecture in total (praise, criticism, wishes,...)..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

10 .) Do you have remarks or suggestions for improvement concerning this evaluation sheet?..6 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9