Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Transkript

1 Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Kaiserstrasse 76 Karlsruhe Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Sehr geehrter Herr Dipl. -Ing. Nikolai Stache (PERSÖNLICH) Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden Sehr geehrter Herr Dipl. -Ing. Stache, Mit diesem Schreiben erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation Ihrer Veranstaltung Hydraulic software application. Zu Beginn des Endberichts finden Sie die Häufigkeitstabellen aufgeführt. Bei allen Fragen wird die Anzahl der abgegebenen Antworten (n) angezeigt. Bei den er-skalenfragen finden Sie zusätzlich neben dem Histogramm den Mittelwert (mw) und die Standardabweichung (s) der jeweiligen Frage. Neben manchen Fragen finden Sie zudem ein Ampelsymbol. Jene Fragen dienen dem Qualitätsmanagement der Lehrevaluation. Im vorletzten Teil werden sämtliche er-skalenfragen in einem Profilliniendiagramm abgebildet. Zuletzt sind die Antworten zu den offenen Fragen aufgelistet. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ihr Evaluationsteam

2 Dipl. -Ing. Nikolai Stache Hydraulic software application (960) Erfasste Fragebögen = 0 Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Fragetext Linker Pol % 0% 0% 0% % Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Skala Histogramm Qualitätsindex Erklärung der Ampelsymbole Der Mittelwert liegt unterhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt im Toleranzbereich der Qualitätsrichtlinie. Der Mittelwert liegt innerhalb der Qualitätsrichtlinie.. Questions on the lecture.) How would you estimate the participation of your peers in this lecture? 60% 0% 0% 0% 0% very intense very low mw=.7 s=..) How much do you enjoy visiting this lecture? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% very much not at all mw=.9 s=0.99.) How regularly do you attend this lecture? 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% regularly hardly ever mw=. s=0..) How often do you attend the associated exercises? 77.8%.% 0% 0% 0% regularly hardly ever mw=. s=0..) I am showing interest in the lecture through the following activities (check a many as apply) taking notes regularly 60% contributing actively 0% regular post-editing 0% attending study groups 0% studying the recommended literature 60% attending tutorial/exercise sessions 0% doing internet research 60% working through lectures notes/materials provided by the lecturer 00%.6) How well does the content/topics of this lecture match with those of other lectures of the curriculum? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% mw=. s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 .7) Are you interested in the content/topics of this lecture? Dipl. -Ing. Nikolai Stache, Hydraulic software application 60% 0% 0% 0% 0% very much not at all mw=.7 s=0.9.8) content 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% very easy very difficult mw=. s=0.67.9) scope 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% very narrow very wide mw=. s=0.8.0) prerequisites needed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% few many mw= s=..) pace 0% 0% 70% 0% 0% too slow too fast mw=. s=0.8.) How would you assess the use of media (blackboard, power-point-presentations, etc.) to support the lecture? 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% mw=. s=0..) Did you gain any insight into topics that are of relevance to your professional goal after graduation? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% plenty little mw=. s=..) Do you recognize the lecture s content important for your further studies? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% distinctly not at all mw=. s=..) Do you benefit from attending the lecture? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% greatly not at all mw=.9 s=..6) Did you recognize a recurrent theme throughout the course of the lecture? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% distinctly not at all mw=.9 s=0.7.7) At the beginning of an individual session, is there an adequate transition from the preceding session? 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% always never mw=. s=0..8) Have the goals of the lecture been made accessible to you? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% very well very poorly mw=.9 s=.9.9) How do you assess the consultation hours offered? 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% mw=. s= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 .0) How do you assess the advice given, support offered during consultation hours? 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% mw=. s=0.. Questions on the lecturer.) How would you assess the preparation of the lecturer? 70% 0% 0% 0% 0% mw=. s=0.97.) Does the lecturer present with a loud and clear voice? 60% 0% 0% 0% 0% role model very poor mw=. s=0..) How would you assess the relationship between lecturer and students? 70% 0% 0% 0% 0% cooperative distanced mw=.6 s=.07. Monitoring.) How would you assess this lecture in general?.%.% 0%.% 0% mw=.78 s=0.97.) The workload needed to complete this lecture successfully is 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% too low too high mw= s=0.9.) The workload needed to complete this lecture successfully is.% 0%.%.%.% appropriate inappropriate mw=. s=.9.) How do you assess the structure of the lecture?.% 66.7% 0%.% 0% very well very poor mw= s=0.87.) Does the lecturer show motivation and commitment during the course of the lecture? 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% very much not at all mw=. s=0..6) Is the lecturer responsive to students questions and needs? 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% very much not at all mw=. s=0.6. Questions on your studies.) When do you expect to complete your studies? within the standard period of study 00% EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 .) Presently, what semester are you registered in? - 0% - 00% -6 0% 7-8 0% 9-0 0% and more 0% EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) 7. WS 09/0 Bauingenieurwesen Dipl. -Ing. Nikolai Stache Hydraulic software application.) How would you estimate the participation of your peers in this lecture? very intense very low.) How much do you enjoy visiting this lecture? very much not at all.) How regularly do you attend this lecture? regularly hardly ever.) How often do you attend the associated exercises? regularly hardly ever mw=.7 mw=.9 mw=. mw=..6) How well does the content/topics of this lecture match with those of other lectures of the curriculum? very good very poor mw=..7) Are you interested in the content/topics of this lecture? very much not at all.8) content very easy very difficult.9) scope very narrow very wide.0) prerequisites needed few many.) pace too slow too fast mw=.7 mw=. mw=. mw= mw=..) How would you assess the use of media (blackboard, power-pointpresentations, etc.) to support the lecture? very good very poor mw=..) Did you gain any insight into topics that are of relevance to your professional goal after graduation? plenty little mw=..) Do you recognize the lecture s content important for your further studies? distinctly not at all.) Do you benefit from attending the lecture? greatly not at all.6) Did you recognize a recurrent theme throughout the course of the lecture? distinctly not at all mw=. mw=.9 mw=.9.7) At the beginning of an individual session, is there an adequate transition from the preceding session? always never mw=..8) Have the goals of the lecture been made accessible to you? very well very poorly.9) How do you assess the consultation hours offered? mw=.9 mw=..0) How do you assess the advice given, support offered during consultation hours? very good very poor mw=..) How would you assess the preparation of the lecturer?.) Does the lecturer present with a loud and clear voice? role model very poor.) How would you assess the relationship between lecturer and students? cooperative distanced.) How would you assess this lecture in general?.) The workload needed to complete this lecture successfully is too low too high.) The workload needed to complete this lecture successfully is appropriate inappropriate.) How do you assess the structure of the lecture? very well very poor mw=. mw=. mw=.6 mw=.78 mw= mw=. mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite

7 .) Does the lecturer show motivation and commitment during the course of the lecture? very much not at all mw=..6) Is the lecturer responsive to students questions and needs? very much not at all mw= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

8 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen. Questions on the lecture.) I liked especially:.) What are your points of critique, do you have any suggestions for improvement? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

9 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8