( [Wiemer 2008])., ( 3.,,, -. -, -,, -, -., -. - :,,., ( ) -,., -,, (,,, -,. 3. :,, - ; - ; 3 «(» -.

.. :? 1 1.,, - ( ). - (. [Aikhenvald 2006]),,,., - -, - :, :,,., «-», :,. - 2. (,, ), - 1,.,.,..,..,. - ( ). 2, :, [Grenoble 1998]. jako recitativum [Collins 2001; Perelmutter 2009]. -,,,, [Bolden 2004; 2008; 2010; 2011]. -.

( [Wiemer 2008])., ( 3.,,, -. -, -,, -, -., -. - :,,., ( ) -,., -,, (,,, -,. 3. :,, - ; - ; 3 «(» -.

-.,, -,,, -,,.,, 2, - XI-XXI., -. 3 -,.,. 2. (,.. -,. [ 2006: 13-68; 2008: 85-87]., -..,,, -.. XVIII-XXI -, -, gramoty.ru, www.lrclib.ru/rus_letopisi, izbornyk.org.ua, www.vostlit.info; (lib.pushkinskijdom.ru); «-» (, DirectMedia),,,.

:,,,.,, -., -., -., - -,, XVII-XVIII.,, XVIII XX. (. [ 1996, 2005]). :. - -., X, Y,. (. -, [ 2009: 237 238]). ( -.. 4 : :,,, ( ):,,, ; :, ; 4,,,,.

:,,, ; : ; :,,,., -. 2.1. 2.1.1.. -, -,,., (1-2) 5. (1) : «,,, < >» : «,,, - < >». [.-. (. XIII.)] 6. (2)..., : «,, [ ] [ ],. [. (. XIV )]. 7. 5., : :,,? [.-. (. XIII.)]. 6,.,.

2.1.2...,, (. [, 1965: 270]). -, 8.. (3-5): (3), : «, -,,,,,» [ ], : «-,, [ ],,,,» ( -.. [ 2008 : 273]). [ (c. XII.)]. (4) :,,, : «,, -,». [ (. XV )]. (5),,.,, -. 7, :, - (. ).... :,. 8, 3 - [ -, 1965: 271],. -.

,.,,,,. [ - (1649.)], - XIII-XIV. 9.,. -,, :,. -,, XVII XVIII (. [ 1991]). (6) -. (6),,,, -, -.,,,, - 10. [ I. ; (1721.)]., -, ( -,. [ 2006]). -.. (7): 9 «,, -, XIII- XIV.,,, -, -» [, 1965:294];. [ - 2004: 142]. 10 (. 3),.

(7),,,, : [ ( XX.)]. 2.2. 2.2.1.. 11. ( ), XV, XVII [ 1907: 96]. (8),, :,,,,,,,,,, -,, (.. ). [ (XV )]. 2.2.2. 12. -, -. - : - -,, ;. [ 1953: 170]. 11.. : «, -» [, I,. 1: 802]. [,. III: 172-173]. 12 - XVII,.

(9).,, : «-». [(. (XV )]. (10),, -, - -, -. - IV. (14 1567.)].,. XVII (11), -.. (11),, 115-7- - -,,,,,,, -,,. [ -. (1607.)]. XVI 13 : (12) : «,». [. 3- (1510.);. : 2004: 182)]. 13 : «, -...» (X-XI.) -, «[,,, -» [ - 1987: 115].

(13) -, : «,,». [ - (XVI.)]. XXI., (14) (15). (14), -? - www.fontanka.ru/blog/17931.html. (2007)]. (15),. [.. // -, 1-2. (2000)].,,, XIV,,, ),, XVII, (-). 2.3. 2.3.1..,. -, -. XVII. (16) (!): «.,, -,. [... 1675.)]. : (17).,,..... (1848)]., : (18) :,,,

,! [.. -,? //, 10. (2004)].,.,, -,.. (19),,, -,,. [.. (c. XX.)]. (20),,,, -,,,,... (c. XX.)]. 2.4. -, : [ 1999: 882-883]., - -, - :. 14. - -.. (XVIII.), - 14 - - : / / - /. [... - // ( ), 2006. : (2007)].

- 15. (21), -... (1783)] -. 2.4.1..,,, -,, -,,.,,. ( ) XVI. (22) : «,,,». [ A.M.. (1573.)]. :, - (23),.. (1680 1681.)]. (24) :,. [.. «,». (1772.)]. (25) :,,,,. [.. -., 1812. (1830)]. 15 «[ ] -, -,..» [ 1947: 347].

-. (26) - :,. [. -,. 1 //. (2005)]. (27),, -,, -,? [ www.mnogodetok.ru. (2008)]. 2.4.2..,, -, -, -.,, -,. XX (28). (28),,,,,,. : -., -. (1996)]. 2.5. 2.5.1.., XIX -, (29-30) 16., (29) -,,, ). 16 -, (. [Wälchli 2000]). -.

(29) ;,,,. [.... (1870)]. (30),,,,,, -,,..,,. (2010)]. 2.6. 2.6.1..,, -, -., ), - ), ). - -, - 17. XIX XXI. (31)... :,. «,,?» «,,,». [.... (1889)]. (32),.,,... -,. [.,. (1924-1932)]. (33),, :.... (2004)]. (34) :,! [. //. (2002)]. 17.,,, reku ( 1- ) : Volal som ich, a oni, reku, nemôžu.,,,.

3.,, -. -, -, «-». (35) - : (35) : < > : «< >», - -. (36). (36) :,, - < >. : «,, < >», -,., - 18.., -, - (37). - : - - : 18, :,, :.

(37). ],,,.,,,,,, -., -,. (. ) ( ). -,, -, :, -.. XV -, (38): (38) : «-,,,, [ 1991: 114]), - (39): (39) : «,,» - ).. 1, -,. 1. (

a XI XII XIII XIV x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x / x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x,,,,. 2., -.,, - (, ).,. - : (. )., -, -. -,, - 19.,.. : -, «- XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI 19.., -, -,.

» 2008: 296]... 2009], ( 2006 2009.). -,,,, - [ 2009: 89] 20., -, -, [ 2009: 91] 21.,,,, -,. 4. 2, - (. 2..-. )? (.) 20,,,. 21, :.. -,..... : forum.gramota.ru/forum/read.php?f=1&i=19360&t=19353&v=f.

. ).? / - / -? 22 -, -. ( reported evidence ), [Willet 1988; Aikhenvald 2006: 271 272]., -,, : - [DeLancey 2001; Aikhenvald 2006] 23. 2, -, -,,, ( prý praví,. vraj vraviet reku riec 24 ). ( ) ( [Lindstedt 1985; Levin-Steinmann 2004] - [Friedman 2003]; [Johanson 2003]; - [Leinonen 2000, Linguistica Uralica 2002]. [. Haan; Aikhenvald, Dixon, 2003]).., -, - 22,,,.. 23,, - [Aikhenvald, Dixon 2003; Aikhenvald 2004]. 24.. C. [Wiemer 2008: 35].

., -, -., -.,, -. ( [ 2007: 441]). ). -, ( [, 2004])., - -.,, [. Haan; Aikhenvald, Dixon, 2003]., -. -, [Aikhenvald 2006: 118].. -,, -.,, -., ( - -., - -., - : ( )

,., -, -. - -. -,., -,, -..,, praesens historicum. 5..., - : 1). 2), -,. 3) -. [Aikhenvald 2006: 272-273].,,,.,, -,..

,. :,., -,.,... [ 2009: 43 45]. -,, [ 2008 : 24]...,,, 5-6 6-7 [ 2008 : 44], - [ - 2008 : 264]. 25.. -, : (...),, -.,,. [Grenoble 1998: 136] : (...) -, [Grenoble 1998: 143].., - -..,, -,, - XIII : 25 - :,.,, -.

» [ 2008 : 264-266]., -, - 26.,, - :,, [Willet 1998: 79].,,, -,,, -.. -., -, :, -.,» (..). [Lehmann 1982: x]. 26... : «-,, - : -» [ 1994: 121].

-,..,, -.,, -,,,,. -, -, 27. ( 28?, : > > > [Hopper, Traugot 2003: 7]. :., -,. -,, -, - 27 - [ 2009]. (. «*») -. (, - ). -. 28.,,,.

,.,.,, -.,,, - -. - :,, - ( ), ( ),.,.,,,. : -, -. - - 29., recitativum -. -, (,, ),, - 29,,.., -.

(, ), - [ 2008; Daiber 2010] 30., (, - : -,. 31 ;, - ; - ; - ;,,, - :. -. Verba dicendi -.. -., - :, -, -. 30., :,, VS. - ( [ 2008: 434]). [Daiber 2010]. 31, -.

.. 2000.,, : - //. :.. 437 449... 1994. // - 4. C. 114 124...,.. 1965...:... 1999., :...... 2007. // -. :.. 415 444... 2009. : - //..,..,..,...). : -.. 224 244... 1996. XVIII. : -... 2005.... // 2, 23.. 175 200... 2004.. : -... 2008.. :... 2008.»:..:... 1994. ( - ) // 3.. 92 104...,.. 2004. // Linguistica Uralica 1.. 28 39..., 1947. // : 10.. IV: XVIII.. 2..;.:.. 342 352... 2010. // - : - (, 26 30 2010.)..:.. 284 288... 2008., - // Lexikalische Evidenzialitäts-Marker in slavischen Sprachen.

(Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 72.) München: Sagner. S. 215 237...,.. 2000. -, // - 5.. 68 80... 2009. ( - ) // I. Lunde & M. Paulsen (eds.): From Poets to Padonki: Linguistic Authority and Norm Negotiation in Modern Russian Culture. Bergen: University of Bergen. P. 80 97... 1953...:... 2008. :, // B. Wiemer, V. A. Plungjan (Hrsg.). Lexikalische Evidenzialitäts-Marker in slavischen Sprachen. (Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 72.) München: Sagner. S. 285 311... 2011. //.. (.).. :.. 36-43. = XI XIV., :. 1988.. XI.. XVI. 1987..:... 1907.......1 3.. 1893 1912... 1991., // - :. : -... 110-116.. 2006.. : http://orthdict.narod.ru... (.) 2007.. :, 2007.. 2008. -..:. Aikhenvald A. Y. 2006. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Aikhenvald, A., Dixon R. (eds). Studies in Evidentiality, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bolden G. 2004. The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian // Journal of Pragmatics 36, 6. P. 1071 1118.

Collins D. E. 2001. Reanimated voices: speech reporting in a historicalpragmatic perspective. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Daiber T. 2010. Quotativmarker im Russischen ( ) // Zeitschrift für Slawistik 55, 1. S. 69 89. DeLancey S. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality // Journal of Pragmatics 33. P. 369 382. Friedman V. 2003. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian // A. Aikhenvald, R. Dixon (eds) Studies in Evidentiality, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. P. 189 218. Grenoble L. A. 1998. Deixis and information packaging in Russian discourse, Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Haan F. de. Coding of Evidentiality // The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. : wals.info/feature/description/78. Hopper P. J., Traugott E. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johanson L. 2003. Evidentiality in Turkic // A. Aikhenvald, R. Dixon (eds.). Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. P. 273 290. Kopotev M. 2007. Where Russian syntactic zeros start: approaching Finnish? // Topics on the Ethnic, Linguistic and Cultural Making of the Russian North. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino. P. 116 137. Leinonen M. 2000. Evidentiality in Komi Zyryan // Johanson and Utas (eds.) Evidentials. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. P. 419 440. Lehmann C., 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48. Cologne: Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Levin-Steinmann A. 2004. Die Legende vom bulgarischen Renarrativ. Bedeutung und Funktion der kopulalosen l-periphrase // Slavistische Beiträge Bd. 437. München: Otto-Sagner-Verlag. Linguistica Uralica 2002, 2. Lindstedt J. 1985. On the semantics of tense and aspect in Bulgarian. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino. Perelmutter R. 2009. Pragmatic Functions of Reported Speech with jako in the Old Russian Primary Chronicle // Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10, 1. P. 108 131. Plungian V. A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space // Journal of pragmatics 33, 3. P. 349 357. Wiemer B. 2008. Lexikalische Markierungen evidenzieller Funktionen: zur Theoriebildung und empirischen Erforschung im Slavischen // Wiemer, B., Plungjan, V.A. (Hgg.): Lexikalische Evidenzialitätsmarker im Slavischen. S. 5 49. Willett T. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality // Studies in Language 12, 1. P. 51 97.

Wälchli 2000. Infinite predication as a marker of evidentiality and modality in the languages of the Baltic region // Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53, 2. P. 186 210.